Mohamed v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America et al
Filing
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 27 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re Standard of Review and Dismissal of California Pacific Medical Center Plan filed by California Pacific Medical Center Plan, Unum Life Insurance Company of America. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on May 2, 2018. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/2/2018)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11 JAMILA MOHAMED,
Case No. 3:18-cv-00284-JST
12
ORDER GRANTING
STIPULATION RE: STANDARD
OF REVIEW AND DISMISSAL OF
CALIFORNIA PACIFIC
MEDICAL CENTER PLAN
13
14
15
16
17
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY )
OF AMERICA, CALIFORNIA PACIFIC )
MEDICAL CENTER PLAN,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
Judge: Hon. Jon S. Tigar
Complaint Filed:
January 12, 2018
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant CALIFORNIA PACIFIC
18
19 MEDICAL CENTER PLAN is dismissed from this action without prejudice, with
20 the Parties to bear their own attorneys’ fees and costs directly related to the instant
21 Stipulation to Dismiss and dismissal of CALIFORNIA PACIFIC MEDICAL
22 CENTER PLAN. Unum Life Insurance Company of America shall remain the only
23 named defendant in this action.
IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that the standard of review to be
24
25 employed for trial or on cross-motions for judgment on the claim for disability
26 / / /
27 / / /
28 / / /
1
162135.1
Case No. 3:18-cv-00284-JST
ORDER RE: STANDARD OF REVIEW AND
DISMISSAL OF PLAN
1 benefits will be de novo. This Order regarding the appropriate standard of review is
2 specifically limited to this case.
3
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
May 2, 2018
Dated: ___________________
6
_________________________________
Jon S. Tigar
United States District Court Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LAW OFFICES
2
MESERVE,
MUMPER &
HUGHES LLP
162135.1
Case No. 3:18-cv-00284-JST
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO
DISMISS CALIFORNIA PACIFIC MEDICAL
CENTER PLAN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?