Robbins v. Phillips 66 Company

Filing 46

Discovery Order re: ECF No. #43 . The Court ORDERS the parties to file a corrected Exhibit A by noon on December 14, 2018. No chambers copy is required. Signed by Judge Thomas S. Hixson on 12/13/2018. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/13/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 DEAN A. ROBBINS, Plaintiff, 7 8 9 10 Case No. 18-cv-00292-RS (TSH) DISCOVERY ORDER v. Re: Dkt. No. 43 PHILLIPS 66 COMPANY, Defendant. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 On December 6, 2018, the parties filed a Joint Discovery Letter. ECF No. 43. The Court 13 has a telephonic hearing scheduled for 1:30 p.m. on December 14, 2018 concerning the letter. 14 Exhibit A to the letter is meant to reproduce the discovery requests and responses at issue, as 15 required by the undersigned’s discovery standing order. However, Exhibit A is disorganized. 16 Starting on page 8 the numbers for the interrogatories and the responses do not line up with each 17 other. Pages 14 and 15 state that they list requests for admission, but the text appears to be 18 responses to the requests for admission, not the requests themselves. On pages 22-24 the numbers 19 for the requests for production and the responses do not line up with each other. There are similar 20 mismatches on pages 36, 39 and 40. The Court wants to be sure what responses correspond with 21 which requests, and these errors introduce uncertainty. The Court ORDERS the parties to file a 22 corrected Exhibit A by noon on December 14, 2018. No chambers copy is required. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 Dated: December 13, 2018 26 27 28 THOMAS S. HIXSON United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?