Knepper v. Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.

Filing 9

Judicial Referral for Purpose of Determining Relationship of Cases re C-17-0303 WHO. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 3/30/2018. This case is hereby REFERRED to Judge Orrick to determine whether it is related to case number 17-cv-00303. See Civ. L.R. 3-12(c). Plaintiff must provide a copy of this order to Defendant within two days of the date of this order, and any party may file a response not exceeding five pages no later than ten days after the date of this order. (tlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 DAWN KNEPPER, Plaintiff, 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Case No.18-cv-00304-EDL v. OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C., SUA SPONTE REFERRAL TO DETERMINE WHETHER CASES ARE RELATED Defendant. Plaintiff Dawn Knepper filed this action on January 12, 2018, seeking a declaratory judgment that certain gender discrimination claims that she has raised against Defendant Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C. are not subject to an arbitration agreement. On the same day, Plaintiff filed a separate complaint in the Northern District of California asserting her gender discrimination claims against Defendant. That case was filed under case number 17-cv-00303, which is now assigned to the Honorable William H. Orrick. This case is hereby REFERRED to Judge Orrick to determine whether it is related to case number 17-cv-00303. See Civ. L.R. 312(c). Plaintiff must provide a copy of this order to Defendant within two days of the date of this order, and any party may file a response not exceeding five pages no later than ten days after the date of this order. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 30, 2018 24 25 26 27 28 ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?