Knepper v. Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
Filing
9
Judicial Referral for Purpose of Determining Relationship of Cases re C-17-0303 WHO. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 3/30/2018. This case is hereby REFERRED to Judge Orrick to determine whether it is related to case number 17-cv-00303. See Civ. L.R. 3-12(c). Plaintiff must provide a copy of this order to Defendant within two days of the date of this order, and any party may file a response not exceeding five pages no later than ten days after the date of this order. (tlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2018)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
DAWN KNEPPER,
Plaintiff,
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Case No.18-cv-00304-EDL
v.
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK
& STEWART, P.C.,
SUA SPONTE REFERRAL TO
DETERMINE WHETHER CASES ARE
RELATED
Defendant.
Plaintiff Dawn Knepper filed this action on January 12, 2018, seeking a declaratory
judgment that certain gender discrimination claims that she has raised against Defendant Ogletree,
Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C. are not subject to an arbitration agreement. On the same
day, Plaintiff filed a separate complaint in the Northern District of California asserting her gender
discrimination claims against Defendant. That case was filed under case number 17-cv-00303,
which is now assigned to the Honorable William H. Orrick. This case is hereby REFERRED to
Judge Orrick to determine whether it is related to case number 17-cv-00303. See Civ. L.R. 312(c). Plaintiff must provide a copy of this order to Defendant within two days of the date of this
order, and any party may file a response not exceeding five pages no later than ten days after the
date of this order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 30, 2018
24
25
26
27
28
ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?