Washington v. White et al

Filing 15

ORDER granting 14 Stipulation extending deadlines. Response to 11 MOTION to Dismiss due by 4/4/2018, reply due by 4/11/2018. Response 12 First MOTION to Dismiss due by 4/5/2018, reply due by 4/12/2018. Motion Hearing set for 5/2/2018 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 02, 17th Floor before Judge William H. Orrick. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 03/15/2018. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/14/2018)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

John Houston Scott (SBN 72578)
Lizabeth N. de Vries (SBN 227215)
SCOTT LAW FIRM
1388 Sutter Street, Suite 715
San Francisco, CA 94109
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Izaak D. Schwaiger (SBN 267888)
130 Petaluma Avenue, Suite 1A
Sebastopol, CA 95472
Tel. [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]

9
Attorneys for Plaintiff TYLER WASHINGTON
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13
14
15

TYLER WASHINGTON

16

Case No. 3:18-cv-00333-WHO
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND
BRIEFING SCHEDULE REGARDING
DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS

Plaintiff,

17

v.

18

NICK WHITE, LINDSAY HAYNES, PAUL
WRAPP, and DOES 1-25,

19
20

Defendants.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING
SCHEDULE REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS

1

TO THE COURT AND ALL PARTIES OF RECORD:

2

Pursuant to Northern District Local Rule 6-1(a), Plaintiff Tyler Washington and all

3

Defendants, by and through their respective attorneys of record, hereby stipulate to extend and set

4

a coordinated and unified briefing schedule regarding the Defendants’ motions to dismiss.

5

WHEREAS the parties believe it would be in their mutual interest to have an agreed upon

6

briefing schedule regarding the date for the Plaintiff to file her oppositions to the two motions to

7

dismiss, and for the Defendants to file their reply briefs to Plaintiff’s oppositions to the motions to

8

dismiss; and

9
10

SCOTT LAW FIRM

1388 S UTTER S TREET , S UITE 715
S AN F RANCISCO , CA 94109

11

WHEREAS the parties agree to continue the hearing date from April 18, 2018 to May 2,
2018, or this court’s next available date.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that Plaintiff shall file her opposition to Defendant

12

Lindsay Haynes’ and Paul Wrapp’s motion to dismiss on or before April 4, 2018, and Plaintiff

13

shall file her opposition to Defendant Paul White’s motion to dismiss on or before April 5, 2018.

14

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that the Defendants Lindsay Haynes and Paul Wrapp

15

shall file their reply memorandum in response to Plaintiff’s opposition on or before April 11,

16

2018, Defendant Paul White shall file his reply memorandum in response to Plaintiff’s opposition

17

on or before April 12, 2018.

18
19
20
21

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that the hearing currently scheduled for April 18, 2018
be continued to May 2, 2018, or this court’s next available date.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: March 14, 2018

Respectfully submitted,
SCOTT LAW FIRM

22
23
24

/s/ John Houston Scott_____________
John Houston Scott
Attorney for Plaintiff Tyler Washington

25
26
27
28

-1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING
SCHEDULE REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS

1
2

Dated: March 14, 2018

Respectfully submitted,
BERTRAND, FOX, ELLIOT, OSMAN &
WENZEL

3
4
5

/s/ Thomas F. Bertrand_____________
Thomas F. Bertrand
Attorney for Defendants Lindsay Haynes
and Paul Wrapp

6
7
8
Dated: March 14, 2018

Respectfully submitted,

9
BLUESTONE ZUNINO & HAMILTON, LLP

10

SCOTT LAW FIRM

1388 S UTTER S TREET , S UITE 715
S AN F RANCISCO , CA 94109

11
/s/ Marshall E. Bluestone
________
Marshall E. Bluestone
Attorney for Defendant Nick White

12
13
14
15

ELECTRONIC CASE FILING ATTESTATION
I, John Houston Scott, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used

16

to file the foregoing documents. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5.1(i), I hereby attest that

17

concurrence in the filing of these documents has been obtained from each of its signatories.

18

Dated: March 14, 2018

SCOTT LAW FIRM

19
By: /s/ John Houston Scott
John Houston Scott

20
21
22
23
24

The matter before the Court is the parties’ Stipulation regarding the above set schedule for
Defendants motions to dismiss. PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED: the
hearing will be held on May 2, 2018.

25
26
27
28

Dated: March 15, 2018
______________________________________
THE HON. WILLIAM H. ORRICK
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
-2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING
SCHEDULE REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS