Johnson, Jr. v. Maguire Correctional Facility

Filing 5

ORDER OF SERVICE; ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO FILE A DISPOSITIVE MOTION OR NOTICE REGARDING SUCH MOTION; INSTRUCTIONS TO CLERK - The Clerk of the Court shall issue summons and the United States Marshal shall serve, without prepayment of fees, a copy of the 3 complaint in this matter, all attachments thereto, and a copy of this order upon R. Recorder and J. Costa at the Maguire Correctional Facility. The Clerk shall also mail courtesy copies of the complaint and this order to the Californi a Attorney Generals Office. Dispositive Motion due by 8/6/2018. Defendant Maguire Correctional Facility is DISMISSED. The Clerk shall add R. Recorder and J. Costa as defendants. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 05/01/2018. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/1/2018)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

LARVESTER J. JOHNSON, JR.,
Plaintiff,

12
13
14
15
16

Case No. 18-cv-00366-WHO (PR)
ORDER OF SERVICE;

v.
MAGUIRE CORRECTIONAL
FACILITY, et al.,
Defendants.

ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS
TO FILE A DISPOSITIVE MOTION
OR NOTICE REGARDING SUCH
MOTION;
INSTRUCTIONS TO CLERK

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Larvester Johnson alleges that his jailors at the Maguire Correctional
Facility (“MCF”) violated his constitutional rights by placing him in solitary confinement.
His 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights complaint containing these allegations is now before the
Court for review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a).
Having concluded that the operative complaint (Dkt. No. 3) states cognizable
claims against defendants, the Court directs defendants to file in response to the complaint
a dispositive motion, or notice regarding such motion, on or before August 6, 2018, unless
an extension is granted. The Court further directs that defendants comply with the notice
provisions detailed in Sections 2.a and 10 of the conclusion of this order.

DISCUSSION

1
2

A.

Standard of Review
A federal court must conduct a preliminary screening in any case in which a

3
4

prisoner seeks redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a

5

governmental entity. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). In its review, the court must identify any

6

cognizable claims and dismiss any claims that are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a claim

7

upon which relief may be granted or seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune

8

from such relief. See id. § 1915A(b)(1), (2). Pro se pleadings must be liberally construed.

9

See Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Dep’t, 901 F.2d 696, 699 (9th Cir. 1988).
A “complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a

10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

claim to relief that is plausible on its face.’” Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009)

12

(quoting Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). “A claim has facial

13

plausibility when the plaintiff pleads factual content that allows the court to draw the

14

reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged.” Id. (quoting

15

Twombly, 550 U.S. at 556). Furthermore, a court “is not required to accept legal

16

conclusions cast in the form of factual allegations if those conclusions cannot reasonably

17

be drawn from the facts alleged.” Clegg v. Cult Awareness Network, 18 F.3d 752, 754–55

18

(9th Cir. 1994).
To state a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a plaintiff must allege two essential

19
20

elements: (1) that a right secured by the Constitution or laws of the United States was

21

violated, and (2) that the alleged violation was committed by a person acting under the

22

color of state law. See West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42, 48 (1988).

23

B.

24

Legal Claims
Johnson alleges that in 2017, (i) R. Recorder, a deputy sheriff at MCF, and J. Costa,

25

a “sergeant sheriff” at MCF, directed other sheriff’s deputies to (i) use excessive force

26

against him; (ii) place him in solitary confinement; and (iii) outfit him with “suicide risk

27

safety Ferguson gown,” all without due process and in violation of his First Amendment

28

right to receive stamps and envelopes; and (ii) J. Costa had plaintiff charged with a
2

1

disciplinary infraction in retaliation for exercising his First Amendment right to receive

2

stamps and envelopes and for exercising his Sixth Amendment right to act as his own

3

lawyer.

4

Claim 1’s allegations that Johnson’s First, Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment rights

5

were violated state claims for relief, when liberally construed. Claim 2’s allegations that

6

plaintiff’s First Amendment rights were violated state a claim for relief, when liberally

7

construed.

8

Johnson’s Sixth Amendment claims are DISMISSED as conclusory. The

9

allegations lack any description of what lawyerly activities he was seeking to engage in.

10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

Maguire Correctional Facility is DISMISSED as a defendant. The Clerk shall add
R. Recorder and J. Costa as defendants.
CONCLUSION

12
13

For the foregoing reasons, the Court orders as follows:

14

1.

The Clerk of the Court shall issue summons and the United States Marshal

15

shall serve, without prepayment of fees, a copy of the complaint in this matter (Dkt.

16

No. 3), all attachments thereto, and a copy of this order upon R. Recorder and J. Costa at

17

the Maguire Correctional Facility. The Clerk shall also mail courtesy copies of the

18

complaint and this order to the California Attorney General’s Office.

19

2.

On or before August 6, 2018, defendants shall file a motion for summary

20

judgment or other dispositive motion with respect to the claim(s) in the complaint found to

21

be cognizable above.

22

a.

If defendants elect to file a motion to dismiss on the grounds plaintiff

23

failed to exhaust his available administrative remedies as required by 42 U.S.C.

24

§ 1997e(a), defendants shall do so in a motion for summary judgment, as required by

25

Albino v. Baca, 747 F.3d 1162 (9th Cir. 2014).

26

b.

Any motion for summary judgment shall be supported by adequate

27

factual documentation and shall conform in all respects to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of

28

Civil Procedure. Defendants are advised that summary judgment cannot be granted, nor
3

1

qualified immunity found, if material facts are in dispute. If any defendant is of the

2

opinion that this case cannot be resolved by summary judgment, he shall so inform the

3

Court prior to the date the summary judgment motion is due.

4

3.

Plaintiff’s opposition to the dispositive motion shall be filed with the Court

5

and served on defendants no later than forty-five (45) days from the date defendants’

6

motion is filed.

7

4.

8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

Defendants shall file a reply brief no later than fifteen (15) days after

plaintiff’s opposition is filed.
5.

The motion shall be deemed submitted as of the date the reply brief is due.

No hearing will be held on the motion unless the Court so orders at a later date.
6.

All communications by the plaintiff with the Court must be served on

12

defendants, or defendants’ counsel once counsel has been designated, by mailing a true

13

copy of the document to defendants or defendants’ counsel.

14

7.

Discovery may be taken in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil

15

Procedure. No further court order under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(a)(2) or Local

16

Rule 16-1 is required before the parties may conduct discovery.

17

8.

It is plaintiff’s responsibility to prosecute this case. Plaintiff must keep the

18

court informed of any change of address and must comply with the court’s orders in a

19

timely fashion. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of this action for failure to

20

prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

21
22
23

9.

Extensions of time must be filed no later than the deadline sought to be

extended and must be accompanied by a showing of good cause.
10.

A decision from the Ninth Circuit requires that pro se prisoner-plaintiffs be

24

given “notice of what is required of them in order to oppose” summary judgment motions

25

at the time of filing of the motions, rather than when the court orders service of process or

26

otherwise before the motions are filed. Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934, 939-41 (9th Cir.

27

2012). Defendants shall provide the following notice to plaintiff when they file and serve

28

any motion for summary judgment:
4

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

The defendants have made a motion for summary judgment by which they
seek to have your case dismissed. A motion for summary judgment under
Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure will, if granted, end your
case.
Rule 56 tells you what you must do in order to oppose a motion for summary
judgment. Generally, summary judgment must be granted when there is no
genuine issue of material fact — that is, if there is no real dispute about any
fact that would affect the result of your case, the party who asked for
summary judgment is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, which will end
your case. When a party you are suing makes a motion for summary
judgment that is properly supported by declarations (or other sworn
testimony), you cannot simply rely on what your complaint says. Instead,
you must set out specific facts in declarations, depositions, answers to
interrogatories, or authenticated documents, as provided in Rule 56(e), that
contradict the facts shown in the defendants’ declarations and documents and
show that there is a genuine issue of material fact for trial. If you do not
submit your own evidence in opposition, summary judgment, if appropriate,
may be entered against you. If summary judgment is granted, your case will
be dismissed and there will be no trial.
Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 962-63 (9th Cir. 1998).
11.

It is plaintiff’s responsibility to prosecute this case. Plaintiff must keep the

court informed of any change of address and must comply with the court’s orders in a
timely fashion. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of this action for failure to
prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).
12.

Defendant Maguire Correctional Facility is DISMISSED.

13.

The Clerk shall add R. Recorder and J. Costa as defendants.

21
22
23

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 1, 2018

24

_________________________
WILLIAM H. ORRICK
United States District Judge

25
26
27
28
5