Vasser v. Santa Clara County et al

Filing 23

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 1/2/19. The deputy clerk hereby certifies that on 1/3/19 a copy of this order was served by sending it via first-class mail to the address of each non-CM/ECF user listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/2/2019)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 ROBERT LEROY VASSER, Plaintiff, Case No. 18-cv-00496-RS (PR) 10 v. ORDER OF DISMISSAL United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 S. BOCANEGRA, et al., Defendants. 13 14 15 Mail sent by the Court to plaintiff was returned as undeliverable more than 60 days 16 ago. Accordingly, the action is DISMISSED (without prejudice) because plaintiff failed to 17 keep the Court apprised of his current address pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-11(b) and 18 because he failed to prosecute this matter pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 19 Defendants’ motion to extend time to file a dispositive motion is DENIED as moot. 20 (Dkt. No. 22.) The Clerk shall terminate all pending motions, enter judgment in favor of 21 defendants, and close the file. 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Dated: January___, 2019 _________________________ RICHARD SEEBORG United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?