Vasser v. Santa Clara County et al
Filing
23
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 1/2/19. The deputy clerk hereby certifies that on 1/3/19 a copy of this order was served by sending it via first-class mail to the address of each non-CM/ECF user listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/2/2019)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
ROBERT LEROY VASSER,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 18-cv-00496-RS (PR)
10
v.
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
S. BOCANEGRA, et al.,
Defendants.
13
14
15
Mail sent by the Court to plaintiff was returned as undeliverable more than 60 days
16
ago. Accordingly, the action is DISMISSED (without prejudice) because plaintiff failed to
17
keep the Court apprised of his current address pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-11(b) and
18
because he failed to prosecute this matter pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
19
Defendants’ motion to extend time to file a dispositive motion is DENIED as moot.
20
(Dkt. No. 22.) The Clerk shall terminate all pending motions, enter judgment in favor of
21
defendants, and close the file.
22
IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Dated: January___, 2019
_________________________
RICHARD SEEBORG
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?