NuGEN Technologies, Inc. v. KeyGene N.V. et al

Filing 32

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 31 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 25 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Standing To Enlarge Time to Respond filed by NuGEN Technologies, Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on April 3, 2018. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/3/2018)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

BROWN RUDNICK LLP
LEO J. PRESIADO, #166721
[e-mail]
2211 Michelson Drive
Seventh Floor
Irvine, CA 92612
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
BROWN RUDNICK LLP
WAYNE F. DENNISON (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
JESSICA T. LU (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
One Financial Center
Boston, MA 02111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
NuGEN Technologies, Inc.

12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13
14
15

NUGEN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
Plaintiff

16
17

vs.

18

KEYGENE N.V. and
KEYGENE, INC.,

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Defendants.

CASE NO.: 3:18-CV-00525-JST
JOINT STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER
ENLARGING TIME TO RESPOND
TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO
DISMISS [D.I. 25]

Pursuant to Local Rules 6-1, 6-2, and 7-12, Plaintiff NuGEN Technologies,

1
2

Inc. (“NuGEN”) and Defendant Keygene, Inc. (“Keygene”), through their counsel,

3

submit the following Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Enlarging Time to

4

Respond to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss [D.I. 25].
WHEREAS, Keygene filed a motion to dismiss for lack of standing on

5
6

March 19, 2018 [D.I. 25] (the “Motion”);
WHEREAS, NuGEN’s response to the Motion is due on April 2, 2018 [D.I.

7
8

25];
WHEREAS, a one-week enlargement of NuGEN’s time to respond to the

9
10

Motion to April 9, 2018 will not impact any hearing or proceeding on the Court’s

11

calendar;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, NuGEN and

12
13

KeyGene stipulate, subject to the approval of the Court, that NuGEN’s time to

14

respond to Keygene’s Motion is enlarged to and including April 9, 2018.

15

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

16

Dated: March 30, 2018

Respectfully submitted,

17

BROWN RUDNICK LLP

18

By: /s/ Leo J. Presiado
Leo J. Presiado, #166721

19

BROWN RUDNICK LLP
Leo J. Presiado, #166721
[e-mail]
2211 Michelson Drive
Seventh Floor
Irvine, CA 92612
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

20
21
22
23
24

Wayne F. Dennison (pro hac vice)
Jessica T. Lu (pro hac vice)
One Financial Center
Boston, MA 02111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

25
26
27
28
2
62992202 v2

Attorneys for Plaintiff
NuGEN Technologies, Inc.

1
2
3

FOLEY & LARDNER LLP

4

By: _/s/ Kimberly K. Dodd
Kimberly K. Dodd, CA Bar No. 235109

5

[e-mail]
Foley & Lardner LLP
777 East Wisconsin Avenue
Milwaukee, WI 53202-5306
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 474.297.4900

6
7
8
9

Eva K. Freel, CA Bar No. 318287
Foley & Larder LLP
555 South Flower Street, Suite 3500
Los Angeles, CA 90071-2411
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 213.486.0065
E-mail: [e-mail]

10
11
12
13

Attorneys for Defendant Keygene N.V.

14
15
16

FILER’S ATTESTATION

17
18

Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I, Jessica T. Lu, attest that concurrence in
filing this document has been obtained from the other signatories.

19
20

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

21
22

April 3, 2018
Date: _____________

23
24

__________________________
HONORABLE JON S. TIGAR
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

25
26
27
28
3
62992202 v2