NuGEN Technologies, Inc. v. KeyGene N.V. et al

Filing 59

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 58 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 54 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff/Counterclaim-Defendant NuGEN Technologies, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim filed by NuGEN Technologies, Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on May 29, 2018. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/29/2018)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

BROWN RUDNICK LLP
LEO J. PRESIADO, #166721
[e-mail]
2211 Michelson Drive
Seventh Floor
Irvine, CA 92612
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
BROWN RUDNICK LLP
WAYNE F. DENNISON (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
REBECCA M. LECAROZ (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
JESSICA T. LU (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
One Financial Center
Boston, MA 02111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
NuGEN Technologies, Inc.

13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14
15
16

NUGEN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

17

Plaintiff

18

vs.

19

KEYGENE N.V,

20

Defendant.

CASE NO.: 3:18-CV-00525-JST
JOINT STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING
THE HEARING DATE FOR
PLAINTIFF/COUNTERCLAIMDEFENDANT’S MOTION TO
DISMISS [ECF NO. 54]

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Setting the Hearing Date
for Plaintiff/Counterclaim-Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss
Case No. 3:18-CV-00525-JST

1

Pursuant to Local Rules 6-1, 6-2, and 7-12, Plaintiff NuGEN Technologies,

2

Inc. (“NuGEN”) and Defendant Keygene N.V. (“Keygene”), through their counsel,

3

submit the following Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Setting the Hearing

4

Date for NuGEN’s Motion to Dismiss Keygene’s Counterclaim (ECF No. 54).

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

WHEREAS, NuGEN filed a Motion to Dismiss Keygene’s Counterclaim on
May 15, 2018 (ECF No. 54), which noticed a hearing date of June 28, 2018;
WHEREAS, Keygene’s opposition to the Motion to Dismiss is now due on
June 12, 2018 (ECF No. 57);
WHEREAS, NuGEN’s reply in support of its Motion to Dismiss is now due
on June 19, 2018 (ECF No. 57);
WHEREAS, this Court continued the hearing date on NuGEN’s Motion to
Dismiss from June 28, 2018 to July 5, 2018 (ECF No. 56);
WHEREAS, a further one-week continuance of the hearing date from July 5,
2018 to July 12, 2018 is warranted in light of undersigned counsel’s schedules; and

15

WHEREAS, a one-week continuance of the hearing date will not impact any

16

hearing or proceeding on the Court’s calendar or have any effect on the schedule for

17

this case;

18

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, NuGEN and

19

Keygene stipulate, subject to the approval of the Court, that the hearing on

20

NuGEN’s Motion to Dismiss is continued from July 5, 2018 to July 12, 2018 at

21

2:00 p.m. in San Francisco, Courtroom 9, 19th Floor before Judge Tigar.

22
23

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

24

Dated: May 29, 2018

Respectfully submitted,

25

BROWN RUDNICK LLP

26

By: /s/ Leo J. Presiado
Leo J. Presiado, #166721

27
28

Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Setting the Hearing Date
for Plaintiff/Counterclaim-Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss
Case No. 3:18-CV-00525-JST
2

1

BROWN RUDNICK LLP
Leo J. Presiado, #166721
[e-mail]
2211 Michelson Drive
Seventh Floor
Irvine, CA 92612
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

2
3
4
5

Wayne F. Dennison (pro hac vice)
Rebecca M. Lecaroz (pro hac vice)
Jessica T. Lu (pro hac vice)
One Financial Center
Boston, MA 02111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

6
7
8
9
10
11

Attorneys for Plaintiff
NuGEN Technologies, Inc.

12
13
14

FOLEY & LARDNER LLP

15

By: /s/ Kimberly K. Dodd
Kimberly K. Dodd, CA Bar No. 235109

16

[e-mail]
Foley & Lardner LLP
777 East Wisconsin Avenue
Milwaukee, WI 53202-5306
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 474.297.4900

17
18
19

Eva K. Freel, CA Bar No. 318287
Foley & Larder LLP
555 South Flower Street, Suite 3500
Los Angeles, CA 90071-2411
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 213.486.0065
E-mail: [e-mail]

20
21
22
23

Liane M. Peterson (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Bradley D. Roush (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Foley & Lardner LLP
3000 K Street, NW

24
25
26
27
28

Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Setting the Hearing Date
for Plaintiff/Counterclaim-Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss
Case No. 3:18-CV-00525-JST
3

2

Washington, DC 20007
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 202.672.5399

3

Attorneys for Defendant Keygene N.V.

1

4
5

FILER’S ATTESTATION

6
7

Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I, Rebecca M. Lecaroz, attest that

8

concurrence in filing this document has been obtained from the other signatories.

9
10
11

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

12
13
14

May 29, 2018
Date: _____________

__________________________
HONORABLE JON S. TIGAR
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Setting the Hearing Date
for Plaintiff/Counterclaim-Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss
Case No. 3:18-CV-00525-JST
4