Dragoman, Jr. v. Adams
Filing
5
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 4/5/2018 08:00 AM in Courtroom No. 12. Show Cause Response due by 3/22/2018. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 3/8/2018. (whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/8/2018) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/8/2018: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (afmS, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
LYNN FRANK DRAGOMAN, JR.,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
v.
KERRY LEE ADAMS,
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
Defendant.
/
15
16
No. C 18-00845 WHA
Pro se plaintiff Lynn Frank Dragoman, Jr., filed a Request for Civil Harassment
17
Restraining Order under Sections 527.6 and 527.9 of the California Code Civil Procedure in
18
Sonoma County Superior Court on January 23, 2018. On February 8, defendant Kerry Lee
19
Adams removed the action. On February 15, defendant moved to dismiss the complaint in its
20
entirety. The notice of removal and motion to dismiss were served on plaintiff, and plaintiff
21
was given until March 1 to file a response. To date, plaintiff has not filed a response to
22
defendant’s motion to dismiss.
23
Plaintiff SHALL FILE A RESPONSE to the motion to dismiss by MARCH 15, 2018. If he
24
fails to do so, the complaint may be dismissed. Plaintiff shall appear in courtroom 12 on the
25
19th floor of 450 Golden Gate Ave., San Francisco on APRIL 5 AT 8:00 A.M. and SHOW CAUSE
26
27
28
1
why his complaint should not be dismissed. Defendant’s reply to plaintiff’s response, if any, is
2
due by MARCH 22.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
Dated: March 8, 2018.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?