ABID v. GOOGLE LLC

Filing 81

ORDER by Judge Maria-Elena James striking 79 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/16/2018)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 SHAJAR ABID, Case No. 18-cv-00981-MEJ Plaintiff, 5 ORDER RE: MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW v. 6 7 GOOGLE LLC, Re: Dkt. No. 79 Defendant. 8 Plaintiff has filed a pleading styled “Motion for Judgment as Matter of Law, Motion under 10 Rule 42, and Motion for Judicial Review.” ECF No. 79. The Court assumes Plaintiff’s motion is 11 United States District Court Northern District of California 9 a summary judgment motion. Such motion is premature, given that Defendant has not yet filed an 12 Answer, and there is a pending Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint. ECF 13 No. 76. Moreover, Plaintiff appears to be seeking summary judgment against entities that are not 14 before the Court, including the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”), and he asserts claims and 15 seeks relief on issues that are not the subject of Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint, including 16 an alleged violation of Plaintiff’s First Amendment rights and the constitutionality of 21 U.S.C 17 §321(g)(1)(B). Plaintiff’s “Motion under Rule 42” is likewise misplaced. Plaintiff apparently 18 seeks to sever claims against the FDA and to have them transferred to the Court of Federal 19 Claims. However, there are no claims against the FDA asserted in the Second Amended 20 Complaint. It is unclear what Plaintiff is seeking with respect to his “Motion for Judicial 21 Review.” This motion is likely directed towards Plaintiff’s claim that certain statutory provisions 22 are unconstitutional. These issues fall outside the scope of the Second Amended Complaint and 23 are not properly before the Court. Accordingly, the Court STRIKES Plaintiff’s “Motion for 24 Judgment as Matter of Law, Motion under Rule 42, and Motion for Judicial Review,” ECF No. 79. 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 16, 2018 ______________________________________ MARIA-ELENA JAMES United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?