ABID v. GOOGLE LLC
Filing
81
ORDER by Judge Maria-Elena James striking 79 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/16/2018)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
SHAJAR ABID,
Case No. 18-cv-00981-MEJ
Plaintiff,
5
ORDER RE: MOTION FOR
JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW
v.
6
7
GOOGLE LLC,
Re: Dkt. No. 79
Defendant.
8
Plaintiff has filed a pleading styled “Motion for Judgment as Matter of Law, Motion under
10
Rule 42, and Motion for Judicial Review.” ECF No. 79. The Court assumes Plaintiff’s motion is
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
9
a summary judgment motion. Such motion is premature, given that Defendant has not yet filed an
12
Answer, and there is a pending Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint. ECF
13
No. 76. Moreover, Plaintiff appears to be seeking summary judgment against entities that are not
14
before the Court, including the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”), and he asserts claims and
15
seeks relief on issues that are not the subject of Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint, including
16
an alleged violation of Plaintiff’s First Amendment rights and the constitutionality of 21 U.S.C
17
§321(g)(1)(B). Plaintiff’s “Motion under Rule 42” is likewise misplaced. Plaintiff apparently
18
seeks to sever claims against the FDA and to have them transferred to the Court of Federal
19
Claims. However, there are no claims against the FDA asserted in the Second Amended
20
Complaint. It is unclear what Plaintiff is seeking with respect to his “Motion for Judicial
21
Review.” This motion is likely directed towards Plaintiff’s claim that certain statutory provisions
22
are unconstitutional. These issues fall outside the scope of the Second Amended Complaint and
23
are not properly before the Court. Accordingly, the Court STRIKES Plaintiff’s “Motion for
24
Judgment as Matter of Law, Motion under Rule 42, and Motion for Judicial Review,” ECF No. 79.
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 16, 2018
______________________________________
MARIA-ELENA JAMES
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?