Lewis et al v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company et al

Filing 50

Order by Judge William H. Orrick granting 48 Stipulation selecting Private ADR. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/9/2018)

Download PDF
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 en CL n: __, _, NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 z 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION UJ I::! 13 z o en z ~ :a 14 >-- w _, NICOLETTE LEWIS, ALEXIS LEWIS, MARGRETT LEWIS; and JEFFREY LEWIS, 15 ~ ~ en o :r: ~ ~ 0: == ffi :a Judge: The Hon. William H. Orrick 16 17 18 19 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS Plaintiffs, 0: a. Case No.: 3:18-cv-01138-WHO V. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, LIBERTY INTERNATIONAL UNDERWRITERS, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants. 20 . . .I 21 Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have 22 23 reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The 24 parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: 25 _ Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) _ Mediation (ARD L.R. 6) 26 27 28 ..X. Private ADR - Private Mediation Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation Case No. 3: I 8-cv-0 I 138-WHO Case 3:18-cv-01138-WHO Document 48 Filed 05/08/18 Page 2 of 2 The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: 1 2 3 _X_ the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to ADR, unless otherwise ordered) 4 5 _ other requested deadline: 6 7 8 9 DATED:Mav 8 ,2018 . /~~-----·-_, (_jfL,----·Le· R. PERRY Attornev for Plaintiffs Bv·, 10 LESLIE 11 z g 12 ~ 0,:---' ~ ~ :z :1:: "":.~ 13 is gJ O.2018 14 Q~ - w DATED: Mav 15 ~ ::;; >- ---' ---' IY ffi ~ a. 16 17 _ _ IT IS SO ORDERED XX _ _ IT IS SO ORDERED WITH MODIFICATIONS: 18 19 20 21 22 DATED: May 9, 2018 23 U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 24 25 26 27 28 2 Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation Case No. 3:18-cv-0l 138-WHO

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?