Kinney v. Cantil-Sakauye et al

Filing 6

ORDER DENYING 3 MOTION FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ELECTRONICALLY; DISMISSING CASE SUA SPONTE. Signed by Judge Vince Chhabria on 3/9/2018. (vclc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/9/2018)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CHARLES KINNEY, Case No. 18-cv-01158-VC Plaintiff, v. TANI G. CANTIL-SAKAUYE, et al., Defendants. ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ELECTRONICALLY; DISMISSING CASE SUA SPONTE Re: Dkt. No. 3 Charles Kinney's complaint against the Chief Justice of the California Supreme Court and a California Court of Appeal justice is a de facto appeal of state court decisions, and any additional issues raised are inextricably intertwined with these state court decisions. Therefore, this Court is without subject matter jurisdiction. Because no amendment could cure these defects, this action is dismissed sua sponte without leave to amend, and Kinney's motion for permission to file electronically is denied as moot. See Kinney v. Rothschild, No. 17-cv-07366VC, Dkt. No. 5 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 26, 2018); Kinney v. Boren, No. 16-cv-06505-VC, Dkt. No. 12 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 10, 2016). IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 9, 2018 ______________________________________ VINCE CHHABRIA United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?