Kinney v. Cantil-Sakauye et al
ORDER DENYING 3 MOTION FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ELECTRONICALLY; DISMISSING CASE SUA SPONTE. Signed by Judge Vince Chhabria on 3/9/2018. (vclc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/9/2018)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case No. 18-cv-01158-VC
TANI G. CANTIL-SAKAUYE, et al.,
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
PERMISSION TO FILE
CASE SUA SPONTE
Re: Dkt. No. 3
Charles Kinney's complaint against the Chief Justice of the California Supreme Court and
a California Court of Appeal justice is a de facto appeal of state court decisions, and any
additional issues raised are inextricably intertwined with these state court decisions. Therefore,
this Court is without subject matter jurisdiction. Because no amendment could cure these
defects, this action is dismissed sua sponte without leave to amend, and Kinney's motion for
permission to file electronically is denied as moot. See Kinney v. Rothschild, No. 17-cv-07366VC, Dkt. No. 5 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 26, 2018); Kinney v. Boren, No. 16-cv-06505-VC, Dkt. No. 12
(N.D. Cal. Nov. 10, 2016).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 9, 2018
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?