Pham v. Board of Regents of the University of California et al

Filing 23

ORDER GRANTING 22 STIPULATION, CONSOLIDATING CASES, AND SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE by Judge William H. Orrick. 19 Motion to Remand is withdrawn. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/4/2018)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5
6

HIEU PHAM,
Plaintiff,

7
8

Case No. 18-cv-01498-WHO

v.

9

BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,

10

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION,
CONSOLIDATING CASES, AND
SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Defendants.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

The parties’ stipulation (Dkt. No. 22) is GRANTED.

12

Plaintiff’s motion to remand (Dkt. No. 19) is withdrawn.

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

This case is related to and consolidated with Case No. 17-cv-04194-WHO.
Consequently, plaintiff will need to file a Consolidated Complaint.
Plaintiff shall notify the Court by Wednesday, June 6, 2018, whether he intends to
proceed on all the state claims asserted in the existing Complaint filed in this case. If so, the Court
will rule on the fully briefed and argued motion to dismiss the state law claims, and in that order
will set a date for the filing of the Consolidated Complaint.
If plaintiff intends to drop some of the existing state law claims or believes that further
factual amendment is required to state some of his state law claims (in light of defendants’ motion
to dismiss), he shall notify the Court of that by Wednesday, June 6, 2018, and his Consolidated
Amended Complaint shall be filed on or before June 18, 2018.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 4, 2018

25
26
27
28

William H. Orrick
United States District Judge