Murakami et al v. GC Services, L.P.

Filing 20

ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge for Settlement re 18 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Selecting Early Settlement Conference with a Magistrate Judge filed by Ken Murakami, Carolyn Murakami. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 5/23/18. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/23/2018)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Ken and Carolyn Murakami CASE No C 3:18-cv-1499-EMC Plaintiff(s) v. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS ORDER REFERRING CASE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE GC Services, L.P., FOR SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE Defendant(s) Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:  Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)  Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) s  Early Settlement Conference with a Magistrate Judge (ADR L.R. 7)  Private ADR (specify process and provider) The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: s  the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to ADR)  other requested deadline: Date: May 17, 2018 Date: May 17, 2018 Trinette G. Kent Attorney for Plaintiff Farheena A. Habib Attorney for Defendant xx  IT IS SO ORDERED . This case is referred to magistrate  IT IS SO ORDERED WITH MODIFICATIONS: conference. judge for settlement Settlement conference UNIT ED 5/23/18 S DISTRICT TE C TA ORDER RT U O Date: S is to be held within 90 days. ED A . Chen dward M Judge E FO NO R NIA O IT IS S U.S. DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE IFIED S MOD LI H Form ADR-Stip rev. 5-1-2018 A RT Important! E-file this form in ECF using the appropriate event among these choices: “Stipulation & Proposed ER Order Selecting Mediation” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting ENE” or “Stipulation & Proposed C N F D IS T IC T O Order Selecting Private ADR.” R

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?