Thayer v. Marin County Superior Court
Filing
70
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 1/6/20. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/6/2020) Modified on 1/6/2020 (tfS, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
ASIT S. PANWALA (SBN: 224118)
LAW OFFICE OF ASIT PANWALA
4 Embarcadero Center, Ste 1400
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 766-3526
asit@panwalalaw.com
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Attorney for Plaintiff CYNTHIA THAYER
KATHERINE A. ALBERTS (SBN: 212825)
LEONE & ALBERTS
A Professional Corporation
1390 Willow Pass Road, Suite 700
Concord, CA 94520
Attorney for Defendant
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA,
COUNTY OF MARIN
13
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
16
17
CYNTHIA THAYER, an individual,
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Case No.: 3:18-cv-01505-SI
Plaintiff,
STIPULATION TO DISMISSAL
FRCP 41(a)(1)
vs.
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA,
COUNTY OF MARIN, a public entity, and
DOES 1-10 inclusive,
Defendants.
25
26
27
28
Stipulation To Dismissal
1
1
TO THE HONORABLE COURT:
2
Please take notice that the Parties have executed a settlement agreement in this mat-
3
ter, that Plaintiff is in receipt of the settlement payment, and the Parties stipulate to dis-
4
missing the above-captioned case with prejudice with each party bearing its own attorney’s
5
6
fees, experts’ fees and costs.
7
8
Dated: January 2, 2020
LAW OFFICE OF ASIT PANWALA
9
10
/s/ Asit S. Panwala
Asit S. Panwala, Esq.
Attorney for Plaintiff Cynthia Thayer
11
12
13
14
15
16
Dated: January 2, 2020
LEONE & ALBERTS
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
/s/ Katherine A. Alberts
Attorney for Defendant
Superior Court of California,
County of Marin
I, Asit Panwala, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this
STIPULATION TO DISMISSAL. In compliance with Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby at-
24
test that Katherine A. Alberts has concurred in this filing.
25
26
27
/s/ Asit Panwala
28
Stipulation To Dismissal
2
1
ORDER
2
3
The Parties report that they executed a settlement in this matter, that Plaintiff is in
4
receipt of the settlement payment, and the Parties stipulate to dismissal of the case with
5
6
7
8
prejudice with each party bearing its own attorney’s fees, experts’ fees and costs. The Parties also request that all currently set dates be taken off calendar.
Based on the representation of the Parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
9
10
11
1. The matter is dismissed with prejudice.
2. All currently set dates are taken off calendar.
12
13
Date: January
14
15
6 , 2020
Hon. Susan Ilston
Judge of the U.S. District Court
Northern District of California
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulation To Dismissal
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?