Sanders v. Folk

Filing 19

ORDER DISMISSING REQUEST FOR STAY AS MOOT finding as moot 14 Motion to Stay. (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 2/8/2019) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/8/2019: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (tfS, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 RICKY RENE SANDERS, Petitioner, 8 Re: Dkt. No. 14 FRED FOLK, Respondent. 11 United States District Court Northern District of California ORDER DISMISSING REQUEST FOR STAY AS MOOT v. 9 10 Case No. 18-cv-01558-SI 12 13 Petitioner filed a motion for a stay and abeyance of this action so that he could exhaust state 14 court remedies for some of his claims. Docket No. 14. He recently filed a letter stating that he has 15 now received a decision from the California Supreme Court on his petition for writ of habeas corpus 16 and therefore believes his “claims have been fully exhausted and now are ready for this court’s 17 consideration.” Docket No. 18. A stay is no longer necessary because petitioner has completed his 18 efforts to exhaust state court remedies. Accordingly, the motion for a stay and abeyance is 19 DISMISSED as moot. Docket No. 14. The court will issue shortly an order reviewing the amended 20 petition. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 8, 2019 ______________________________________ SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?