Sanders v. Folk
ORDER DISMISSING REQUEST FOR STAY AS MOOT finding as moot 14 Motion to Stay. (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 2/8/2019) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/8/2019: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (tfS, COURT STAFF).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
RICKY RENE SANDERS,
Re: Dkt. No. 14
United States District Court
Northern District of California
ORDER DISMISSING REQUEST FOR
STAY AS MOOT
Case No. 18-cv-01558-SI
Petitioner filed a motion for a stay and abeyance of this action so that he could exhaust state
court remedies for some of his claims. Docket No. 14. He recently filed a letter stating that he has
now received a decision from the California Supreme Court on his petition for writ of habeas corpus
and therefore believes his “claims have been fully exhausted and now are ready for this court’s
consideration.” Docket No. 18. A stay is no longer necessary because petitioner has completed his
efforts to exhaust state court remedies. Accordingly, the motion for a stay and abeyance is
DISMISSED as moot. Docket No. 14. The court will issue shortly an order reviewing the amended
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 8, 2019
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?