Center for Environmental Health et al v. Perdue et al
Filing
95
Discovery Order re: Dkt. No. 91 (tshlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/17/2019)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
8
CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL
HEALTH, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
9
v.
DISCOVERY ORDER
Re: Dkt. No. 91
10
11
Case No. 18-cv-01763-RS (TSH)
SONNY PERDUE, et al.,
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Defendants.
12
13
Concerning ECF No. 91, the privilege log for the documents Plaintiffs have selected states
14
that documents 10 (OLPP_00143647) and 13 (OLPP_00142662) are redacted. However, from the
15
in camera submission, the Court can’t tell what was redacted. The Court ORDERS Defendants to
16
resubmit these documents in camera in such a fashion that the Court can tell what was redacted. If
17
the redactions are for some reason hard to depict, the Defendants can submit redacted and
18
unredacted versions, and the Court can compare them. Defendants shall submit these documents
19
in camera by October 21, 2019.
20
21
IT IS SO ORDERED.
22
23
Dated: October 17, 2019
24
25
26
27
28
THOMAS S. HIXSON
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?