Center for Environmental Health et al v. Perdue et al

Filing 95

Discovery Order re: Dkt. No. 91 (tshlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/17/2019)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 8 CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, et al., Plaintiffs, 9 v. DISCOVERY ORDER Re: Dkt. No. 91 10 11 Case No. 18-cv-01763-RS (TSH) SONNY PERDUE, et al., United States District Court Northern District of California Defendants. 12 13 Concerning ECF No. 91, the privilege log for the documents Plaintiffs have selected states 14 that documents 10 (OLPP_00143647) and 13 (OLPP_00142662) are redacted. However, from the 15 in camera submission, the Court can’t tell what was redacted. The Court ORDERS Defendants to 16 resubmit these documents in camera in such a fashion that the Court can tell what was redacted. If 17 the redactions are for some reason hard to depict, the Defendants can submit redacted and 18 unredacted versions, and the Court can compare them. Defendants shall submit these documents 19 in camera by October 21, 2019. 20 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 23 Dated: October 17, 2019 24 25 26 27 28 THOMAS S. HIXSON United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?