Durgin v. Rasier, LLC et al

Filing 15

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO 1) MDL No. 2826, 2:18-ml-02826-PSG(GJSx), TRANSFERRING CASE to the Central District of California. (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/16/2018)

Case MDL No. 2826 Document 88 Filed 04/16/18 Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL
on
MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

IN RE: UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., DATA
SECURITY BREACH LITIGATION

MDL No. 2826
2:18-ml-02826-PSG(GJSx)

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO 1)

On April 4, 2018, the Panel transferred 8 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the
Central District of California for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1407. See _F.Supp.3d_ (J.P.M.L. 2018). Since that time, no additional action(s) have been
transferred to the Central District of California. With the consent of that court, all such actions have
been assigned to the Honorable Philip S Gutierrez.
It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are
common to the actions previously transferred to the Central District of California and assigned to
Judge Gutierrez.
Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict
Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the
Central District of California for the reasons stated in the order of April 4, 2018, and, with the
consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Philip S Gutierrez.
This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States
District Court for the Central District of California. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall
be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the
Panel within this 7 day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

FOR THE PANEL:
Apr 16, 2018

Jeffery N. Lüthi
Clerk of the Panel

Case MDL No. 2826 Document 88 Filed 04/16/18 Page 2 of 2

IN RE: UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., DATA
SECURITY BREACH LITIGATION

SCHEDULE CTO 1

DIST

DIV.

MDL No. 2826

TAG ALONG ACTIONS

C.A.NO.

18 00117

Ross v. Uber Technologies Inc

CACD NO.

CASE CAPTION

ALABAMA NORTHERN
ALN

7

2:18-cv-03168-PSG(GJSx)

CALIFORNIA NORTHERN
CAN

3

2:18-cv-03169-PSG(GJSx)

18 01785

Durgin v. Rasier, LLC et al

1

18 00929

Woods v. Uber Technologies, Inc. 2:18-cv-03170-PSG(GJSx)

0

18 00116

Greder v. Uber Technologies Inc. et al
2:18-cv-03171-PSG(GJSx)

18 00216

Celestine v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
2:18-cv-03172-PSG(GJSx)

18 00013

Leffler, Thomas v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

GEORGIA NORTHERN
GAN
MINNESOTA
MN

MISSOURI WESTERN
MOW

4

WISCONSIN WESTERN
WIW

3

2:18-cv-03173-PSG(GJSx)

I hereby attest and certify on _________
4/16/2018
that the foregoing document is full, true
and correct copy of the original on file in
my office, and in my legal custody.
CLERK U.S. DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTR
RAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DEPUTY CLERK