City and County of San Francisco v. Sessions et al

Filing 27

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 26 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order filed by City and County of San Francisco. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on July 10, 2018. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/10/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669 City Attorney JESSE C. SMITH, State Bar #122517 Chief Assistant City Attorney RONALD P. FLYNN, State Bar #184186 Chief Deputy City Attorney YVONNE R. MERÉ, State Bar #173594 Chief of Complex and Affirmative Litigation MOLLIE M. LEE, State Bar #251404 SARA J. EISENBERG, State Bar #269303 Deputy City Attorneys City Hall, Room 234 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place San Francisco, California 94102-4602 Telephone: (415) 554-4748 Facsimile: (415) 554-4715 E-Mail: brittany.feitelberg@sfcityatty.org Attorneys for Plaintiff CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO (See signature page for additional parties and counsel) 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Case No. 3:18-cv-02068-JST STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Plaintiff, vs. JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General of the United States, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, DOES 1-100, Defendants. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS, the United States Attorney’s office was served with the complaint in this action on April 19, 2018; WHEREAS, the defendants filed and served a notice of motion and motion to dismiss on June 18, 2018 (Dkt. 18); WHEREAS, by prior stipulation and order of this Court, plaintiffs’ current deadline to file a First Amended Complaint is July 23, 2018; Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Case No. 3:18-cv-02068-JST 1 n:\affirm\li2018\181193\01288159.docx 1 2 3 4 WHEREAS defendants rescinded 24 Department of Justice guidance documents on July 3, 2018; and WHEREAS plaintiffs require additional time to consider how, if at all, the repeal of these documents impacts its amended complaint; 5 NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate that plaintiffs’ deadline to file a First 6 Amended Complaint shall be moved to July 30, 2018. Defendants’ deadline to file a response to the 7 First Amended Complaint shall remain unchanged (i.e., September 27, 2018). The parties respectfully 8 request that the Court so order, subject to further stipulation or Court order. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Respectfully submitted, Dated: July 9, 2018 DENNIS J. HERRERA City Attorney JESSE C. SMITH RONALD P. FLYNN YVONNE R. MERÉ MOLLIE M. LEE SARA J. EISENBERG Deputy City Attorneys By: /s/ Sara J. Eisenberg SARA J. EISENBERG Deputy City Attorney Attorneys for Plaintiff CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 20 CHAD A. READLER Acting Assistant Attorney General LESLEY R. FARBY Assistant Branch Director, Civil Division CESAR A. LOPEZ-MORALES Trial Attorney By: /s/ Cesar A. Lopez-Morales CESAR A. LOPEZ MORALES Trial Attorney U.S. Department of Justice Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch 20 Massachusetts Ave. NW, Rm. 6216 Washington, DC 20530 Tel: (202) 305-8550 Fax: (202) 616-8460 Email: cesar.a.lopez-morales@usdoj.gov 21 Attorneys for Defendants JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 22 23 24 25 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. July 10 Dated: ________________, 2018 26 ____________________________________ JON S. TIGAR United States District Judge 27 28 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Case No. 3:18-cv-02068-JST 2 n:\affirm\li2018\181193\01288159.docx ATTESTATION OF SIGNATURES 1 2 I, Sara J. Eisenberg, hereby attest, pursuant to Local Civil Rule 5-1(i)(3) of the Northern 3 District of California, that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each 4 signatory hereto. 5 /s/ Sara J. Eisenberg Sara J. Eisenberg Deputy City Attorney 6 7 Attorneys for Plaintiff CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Case No. 3:18-cv-02068-JST 3 n:\affirm\li2018\181193\01288159.docx

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?