City and County of San Francisco v. Sessions et al

Filing 44

ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on February 20, 2019. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/20/2019)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO,

8

Plaintiff,

9
10

v.

ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH
PREJUDICE
Re: ECF No. 42

MATHEW WHITAKER, et al.,

11

United States District Court
Northern District of California

Case No. 18-cv-02068-JST

Defendants.

12
On December 10, 2018, the Court granted Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s

13
14

complaint, concluding that Plaintiff had failed to demonstrate Article III standing. ECF No. 42.

15

The Court dismissed without prejudice Plaintiff’s claims but permitted Plaintiff to “file an

16

amended complaint within 30 days.” Id. at 23. Plaintiff did not file an amended complaint.

17

Accordingly, the case is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk shall enter judgment and close the

18

file.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 20, 2019
______________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge