Firstface Co., Ltd. v. Samsung Electronics Co, Ltd. et al
Filing
32
STIPULATION AND ORDER REFERRING CASE to Private ADR. Signed by Judge James Donato on 7/10/18. (lrcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/10/2018)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Firstface Co., Ltd.
CASE No C 3:18-cv-02243-JD
Plaintiff(s)
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
XXXXXXXX
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
v.
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al.
Defendant(s)
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following
stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the
following ADR process:
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
Note: Magistrate judges do not conduct
mediations under ADR L.R. 6. To request an
early settlement conference with a Magistrate
Judge, you must file a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. Do not use this
form. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR
L.R. 3-5.
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
Private ADR (specify process and provider)
The parties have agreed to conduct mediation
with a mediator from JAMS to be identified at
a later date.
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
■
the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to ADR,
unless otherwise ordered. )
other requested deadline: 30 days after claim construction order
Date: 6/22/2018
Date: 6/22/2018
/s/ Edward R. Nelson III
Attorney for Plaintiff
/s/ Aaron Wainscoat
Attorney for Defendant
S
UNIT
ED
Date: July 10, 2018
RT
U
O
X IT IS SO ORDERED
IT IS SO ORDERED WITH MODIFICATIONS:
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
DERED
O OR
IT IS S
R NIA
■
RT
FO
NO
U.S. DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE
D o n a to
e James
Judg
Form ADR-Stip rev. 1-2017
LI
A
H
Important! E-file this form in ECF using the appropriate event among these choices: “Stipulation & Proposed
Order Selecting Mediation” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting ENE” or “Stipulation & Proposed
ER
C
Order Selecting Private ADR.”
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?