Amey v. State of California et al

Filing 24

ORDER by Judge Breyer granting 8 Motion to Dismiss with leave to amend. (crblc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/27/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 NICOLE HODGE AMEY, Plaintiff, 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants. 12 13 Case No. 18-cv-02406-CRB Nicole Amey, an attorney, sues under the ADA and Rehabilitation Act, complaining 14 of (1) the California Office of Administrative Hearings’ (“OAH”) denial of Amey’s 15 request for a continuance on behalf of her client, and (2) the OAH’s decision to sanction 16 Amey in a different case. Compl. (dkt. 1) at 6–7. Amey’s appeal of the sanctions order is 17 barred under the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. See Noel v. Hall, 341 F.3d 1148, 1163 (9th 18 Cir. 2003) (“[W]hen the plaintiff in federal district court complains of a legal wrong 19 allegedly committed by the state court, and seeks relief from the judgment of that court,” 20 the action is a forbidden de facto appeal.). Meanwhile, Amey’s claim for an injunction 21 under the Rehabilitation Act fails because (1) Amey alleges no wrongdoing by the 22 California Department of Education (CDE and OAH are separate agencies, M.M. v. 23 Lafayette Sch. Dist., 681 F.3d 1082, 1086 (9th Cir. 2012)), and (2) Amey points to no 24 “continuing, present adverse effects” resulting from the OAH’s one-time denial of her 25 request for a continuance, see City of Los Angeles v. Lyons, 461 U.S. 95, 102 (1983). 26 Accordingly, the complaint is DENIED WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. Amey shall file 27 an amended complaint on or before Aug. 17, 2018. The hearing scheduled for Aug. 10 is 28 VACATED. 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 Dated: July 27, 2018 CHARLES R. BREYER United States District Judge 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?