Cadence Design Systems, Inc. v. Skyworth Digital Holdings Ltd. et al
Filing
51
STIPULATION AND ORDER resetting 27 MOTION to Dismiss , 42 MOTION to Dismiss , 22 MOTION to Dismiss or for More Definite Statement. Motion Hearing reset for 11/15/2018 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 05, 1 7th Floor before Judge Edward M. Chen. Case Management Statement due by 11/8/2018. Further Case Management Conference reset for 11/15/2018 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 05, 17th Floor. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 8/15/18. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/15/2018)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Mark C. Holscher (SBN 139582)
mark.holscher@kirkland.com
Diana M. Torres (SBN 162284)
diana.torres@kirkland.com
Tanya Greene (SBN 267975)
tanya.greene@kirkland.com
Lauren Schweitzer (SBN 301654)
lauren.schweitzer@kirkland.com
KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
333 South Hope Street
Los Angeles, California 90071
Telephone: (213) 680-8400
Facsimile: (213) 680-8500
Attorneys for Plaintiff
CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS, INC.
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS, INC., a
Delaware corporation,
Plaintiff,
v.
SKYWORTH DIGITAL HOLDINGS
LTD.; SHENZHEN SKYWORTH
AUTOMOBILE ELECTRONICS CO.
LTD.; SKYWORTH ELECTRONIC
APPLIANCE LTD.; SKYWORTH
ELECTRONICS INC.; SKYWORTH USA
CORPORATION,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. 3:18-cv-02474-EMC
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE
OUTSTANDING DEADLINES AND
HEARINGS DUE TO SETTLEMENT IN
PRINCIPLE; [PROPOSED] ORDER
Judge:
Honorable Edward M. Chen
25
26
27
28
Stipulation to Continue Outstanding Deadlines and Hearings Due to Settlement in Principle
1
Plaintiff Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (“Cadence”) and Defendants Skyworth Digital Holdings
2
Ltd. (“Skyworth Parent”), Shenzhen Skyworth Automobile Electronics Co. Ltd. (“Skyworth Auto”),
3
Skyworth Electronic Appliance Ltd. (“Skyworth EA”), Skyworth Electronics Inc. (“SEI”) and Skyworth
4
USA Corporation (“Skyworth USA”) (collectively the “Parties”) by and through their counsel of record,
5
hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
6
WHEREAS, on April 25, 2018, Cadence filed its Complaint in this Action;
7
WHEREAS, the Parties’ Joint Case Management Statement and Rule 26(f) Report is due on
8
9
10
11
August 16, 2018;
WHEREAS, the Court has scheduled an initial Case Management Conference and hearings on
SEI’s and Skyworth USA’s motions to dismiss for August 23, 2018;
WHEREAS, Cadence’s Opposition to the motion to dismiss filed by Skyworth Parent, Skyworth
12
Auto, and Skyworth EA (collectively “the Non-US Skyworth Entities”) is due on August 21, 2018, and
13
the Non-US Skyworth Entities’ Reply is due on August 28, 2018;
14
15
WHEREAS, the Court has scheduled a hearing on the Non-US Skyworth Entities’ motion for
September 13, 2018;
16
WHEREAS, the Court has ordered the Parties to hold a mediation by November 8, 2018;
17
WHEREAS, the Parties have reached a resolution in principal of their dispute and are in the
18
19
20
21
process of finalizing their agreement;
WHEREAS, the Parties agree that it is in the interest of judicial efficiency to postpone all
outstanding deadlines by roughly 60 days in order to document their settlement in principle;
WHEREAS, the Parties agree that the following deadlines shall be continued as follows:
22
•
Joint Case Management Statement and Rule 26(f) Report: October 15, 2018
•
Initial Case Management Conference and Hearings on SEI’s and Skyworth USA’s
Motions to Dismiss: November 15, 2018 at 1:30 P.M.
25
•
Cadence’s Opposition to Non-US Skyworth Entities’ Motion: October 22, 2018
26
•
Non-US Skyworth Entities’ Reply: October 29, 2018
27
•
Hearing on Non-US Skyworth Entities Motion: November 15, 2018 at 1:30 P.M.
28
•
Deadline to Conduct Mediation: January 7, 2019
23
24
1
Stipulation to Continue Outstanding Deadlines and Hearings Due to Settlement in Principle
1
2
DATED: August 14, 2018
KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
3
4
By: /s/ Lauren Schweitzer
Diana M. Torres
Mark C. Holscher
Tanya Greene (SBN 267975)
Lauren Schweitzer
5
6
7
8
Respectfully submitted,
Dated: August 14, 2018
9
Attorney for Plaintiff
CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS, INC.
Respectfully submitted,
LOCKE LORD LLP
10
By: /s/ Bryan G. Harrison
Regina J. McClendon
Bryan G. Harrison
Meagan S. Tom
11
12
13
Attorneys for Defendant
SKYWORTH ELECTRONICS INC.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Dated: August 14, 2018
Respectfully submitted,
DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP
By: /s/ Jeremy T. Elman
Jeremy T. Elman
Kent J. Schmidt
J. Michael Keyes
Attorneys for Defendants
SKYWORTH USA CORPORATION
SKYWORTH DIGITAL HOLDINGS LTD.
SHENZHEN SKYWORTH AUTOMOBILE
ELECTRONICS CO. LTD.
SKYWORTH ELECTRONIC APPLIANCE
LTD.
24
25
26
27
28
2
Stipulation to Continue Outstanding Deadlines and Hearings Due to Settlement in Principle
1
2
3
4
CERTIFICATION
Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the filing attorney attests that he has obtained concurrence
regarding the filing of this document from the indicated signatories to the document.
DATED: August 14, 2018
KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
5
6
By: /s/ Lauren Schweitzer
Lauren Schweitzer
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Stipulation to Continue Outstanding Deadlines and Hearings Due to Settlement in Principle
1
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Good cause appearing, the below hearings and deadlines are continued as follows:
3
•
Joint Case Management Statement and Rule 26(f) Report: October 15, 2018
4
•
Initial Case Management Conference and Hearings on SEI’s and Skyworth USA’s
Motions to Dismiss: November 15, 2018 at 1:30 P.M.
6
•
Cadence’s Opposition to Non-US Skyworth Entities’ Motion: October 22, 2018
7
•
Non-US Skyworth Entities’ Reply: October 29, 2018
8
•
Hearing on Non-US Skyworth Entities Motion: November 15, 2018 at 1:30 P.M.
9
•
Deadline to Conduct Mediation: January 7, 2019
5
10
11
19
ER
H
18
R NIA
FO
RT
17
Hon. Edward M. Chen
United States District Judge
n
M. Che
Edward
Judge
NO
16
Dated: _________________
D
RDERE
S SO O
______________________________________
IT I
LI
15
8/15/2018
A
14
UNIT
ED
13
RT
U
O
IT IS SO ORDERED.
S
12
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[Proposed] Order
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?