Cadence Design Systems, Inc. v. Skyworth Digital Holdings Ltd. et al

Filing 51

STIPULATION AND ORDER resetting 27 MOTION to Dismiss , 42 MOTION to Dismiss , 22 MOTION to Dismiss or for More Definite Statement. Motion Hearing reset for 11/15/2018 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 05, 1 7th Floor before Judge Edward M. Chen. Case Management Statement due by 11/8/2018. Further Case Management Conference reset for 11/15/2018 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 05, 17th Floor. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 8/15/18. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/15/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Mark C. Holscher (SBN 139582) mark.holscher@kirkland.com Diana M. Torres (SBN 162284) diana.torres@kirkland.com Tanya Greene (SBN 267975) tanya.greene@kirkland.com Lauren Schweitzer (SBN 301654) lauren.schweitzer@kirkland.com KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 333 South Hope Street Los Angeles, California 90071 Telephone: (213) 680-8400 Facsimile: (213) 680-8500 Attorneys for Plaintiff CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS, INC. 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. SKYWORTH DIGITAL HOLDINGS LTD.; SHENZHEN SKYWORTH AUTOMOBILE ELECTRONICS CO. LTD.; SKYWORTH ELECTRONIC APPLIANCE LTD.; SKYWORTH ELECTRONICS INC.; SKYWORTH USA CORPORATION, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 3:18-cv-02474-EMC STIPULATION TO CONTINUE OUTSTANDING DEADLINES AND HEARINGS DUE TO SETTLEMENT IN PRINCIPLE; [PROPOSED] ORDER Judge: Honorable Edward M. Chen 25 26 27 28 Stipulation to Continue Outstanding Deadlines and Hearings Due to Settlement in Principle 1 Plaintiff Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (“Cadence”) and Defendants Skyworth Digital Holdings 2 Ltd. (“Skyworth Parent”), Shenzhen Skyworth Automobile Electronics Co. Ltd. (“Skyworth Auto”), 3 Skyworth Electronic Appliance Ltd. (“Skyworth EA”), Skyworth Electronics Inc. (“SEI”) and Skyworth 4 USA Corporation (“Skyworth USA”) (collectively the “Parties”) by and through their counsel of record, 5 hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 6 WHEREAS, on April 25, 2018, Cadence filed its Complaint in this Action; 7 WHEREAS, the Parties’ Joint Case Management Statement and Rule 26(f) Report is due on 8 9 10 11 August 16, 2018; WHEREAS, the Court has scheduled an initial Case Management Conference and hearings on SEI’s and Skyworth USA’s motions to dismiss for August 23, 2018; WHEREAS, Cadence’s Opposition to the motion to dismiss filed by Skyworth Parent, Skyworth 12 Auto, and Skyworth EA (collectively “the Non-US Skyworth Entities”) is due on August 21, 2018, and 13 the Non-US Skyworth Entities’ Reply is due on August 28, 2018; 14 15 WHEREAS, the Court has scheduled a hearing on the Non-US Skyworth Entities’ motion for September 13, 2018; 16 WHEREAS, the Court has ordered the Parties to hold a mediation by November 8, 2018; 17 WHEREAS, the Parties have reached a resolution in principal of their dispute and are in the 18 19 20 21 process of finalizing their agreement; WHEREAS, the Parties agree that it is in the interest of judicial efficiency to postpone all outstanding deadlines by roughly 60 days in order to document their settlement in principle; WHEREAS, the Parties agree that the following deadlines shall be continued as follows: 22 • Joint Case Management Statement and Rule 26(f) Report: October 15, 2018 • Initial Case Management Conference and Hearings on SEI’s and Skyworth USA’s Motions to Dismiss: November 15, 2018 at 1:30 P.M. 25 • Cadence’s Opposition to Non-US Skyworth Entities’ Motion: October 22, 2018 26 • Non-US Skyworth Entities’ Reply: October 29, 2018 27 • Hearing on Non-US Skyworth Entities Motion: November 15, 2018 at 1:30 P.M. 28 • Deadline to Conduct Mediation: January 7, 2019 23 24 1 Stipulation to Continue Outstanding Deadlines and Hearings Due to Settlement in Principle 1 2 DATED: August 14, 2018 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 3 4 By: /s/ Lauren Schweitzer Diana M. Torres Mark C. Holscher Tanya Greene (SBN 267975) Lauren Schweitzer 5 6 7 8 Respectfully submitted, Dated: August 14, 2018 9 Attorney for Plaintiff CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS, INC. Respectfully submitted, LOCKE LORD LLP 10 By: /s/ Bryan G. Harrison Regina J. McClendon Bryan G. Harrison Meagan S. Tom 11 12 13 Attorneys for Defendant SKYWORTH ELECTRONICS INC. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Dated: August 14, 2018 Respectfully submitted, DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP By: /s/ Jeremy T. Elman Jeremy T. Elman Kent J. Schmidt J. Michael Keyes Attorneys for Defendants SKYWORTH USA CORPORATION SKYWORTH DIGITAL HOLDINGS LTD. SHENZHEN SKYWORTH AUTOMOBILE ELECTRONICS CO. LTD. SKYWORTH ELECTRONIC APPLIANCE LTD. 24 25 26 27 28 2 Stipulation to Continue Outstanding Deadlines and Hearings Due to Settlement in Principle 1 2 3 4 CERTIFICATION Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the filing attorney attests that he has obtained concurrence regarding the filing of this document from the indicated signatories to the document. DATED: August 14, 2018 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 5 6 By: /s/ Lauren Schweitzer Lauren Schweitzer 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 Stipulation to Continue Outstanding Deadlines and Hearings Due to Settlement in Principle 1 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER Good cause appearing, the below hearings and deadlines are continued as follows: 3 • Joint Case Management Statement and Rule 26(f) Report: October 15, 2018 4 • Initial Case Management Conference and Hearings on SEI’s and Skyworth USA’s Motions to Dismiss: November 15, 2018 at 1:30 P.M. 6 • Cadence’s Opposition to Non-US Skyworth Entities’ Motion: October 22, 2018 7 • Non-US Skyworth Entities’ Reply: October 29, 2018 8 • Hearing on Non-US Skyworth Entities Motion: November 15, 2018 at 1:30 P.M. 9 • Deadline to Conduct Mediation: January 7, 2019 5 10 11 19 ER H 18 R NIA FO RT 17 Hon. Edward M. Chen United States District Judge n M. Che Edward Judge NO 16 Dated: _________________ D RDERE S SO O ______________________________________ IT I LI 15 8/15/2018 A 14 UNIT ED 13 RT U O IT IS SO ORDERED. S 12 S DISTRICT TE C TA N F D IS T IC T O R C 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [Proposed] Order

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?