Kramer v. Facebook, Inc.
Filing
39
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 38 TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT, TO SET BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED COMPLAINT, AND TO CONTINUE THE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Statement due by 10/18/2018. Initial Case Management Conference previously set for 9/20/2018 has been continued to 10/25/2018 at 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 03, 17th Floor. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 8/31/18. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/31/2018)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Kathryn S. Diemer
DIEMER & WEI, LLP
100 West San Fernando St. Ste. 555
San Jose, CA 95113
P: 408-971-6270
F: 408-971-6271
kdiemer@diemerwei.com
Phillip A. Bock (Pro Hac Vice)
Daniel J. Cohen (Pro Hac Vice)
Molly E. Stemper (Pro Hac Vice)
BOCK, HATCH, LEWIS & OPPENHEIM, LLC
134 N. La Salle St. Ste. 1000
Chicago, IL 60602
P: 312-658-5500
F: 312-658-5555
phil@classlawyers.com
danieljaycohen209@gmail.com
molly@classlawyers.com
Ilan Chorowsky (Pro Hac Vice)
Mark Bulgarelli (Pro Hac Vice)
Adam Urbanczyk, Of Counsel (Pro Hac Vice)
PROGRESSIVE LAW GROUP, LLC
1570 Oak Ave., Ste. 103
Evanston, IL 60201
P: 312-787-2717
F: 888-574-9038
Counsel for Plaintiff Tony Kramer
and the Proposed Class
17
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
18
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
19
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
20
21
TONY KRAMER, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff,
22
23
24
25
v.
FACEBOOK, INC.,
Defendant.
Case No.
3:18-cv-03113-RS
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO
FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT, TO
SET BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON
MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED
COMPLAINT, AND TO CONTINUE
THE INITIAL CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
26
27
28
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT, TO SET BRIEFING
SCHEDULE ON MTD, AND TO CONTINUE INITIAL CMC
Case No. 3:18-CV-3113-RS
1
This Stipulation is entered into by and between plaintiff Tony Kramer,
2
individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated (“Plaintiff”) and defendant
3
Facebook Inc. (“Defendant”) (Plaintiff and Defendant collectively, “the Parties”) by
4
and through their respective counsel.
5
WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed a Complaint in the above-entitled action in the
6
United States District Court, Northern District of California, on May 24, 2018 and
7
served the Complaint on Defendant on May 25, 2018 (ECF 1);
8
9
WHEREAS, on June 13, 2018, the Parties filed a stipulation to extend time to
respond to the Complaint, to and including July 16, 2018 (ECF 16);
10
WHEREAS, on June 28, 2018, the Parties filed a stipulation and proposed
11
order to reschedule the Initial Case Management Conference to September 20, 2018
12
and setting the deadline to file the Joint Case Management Statement to September
13
13, 2018, which the Court granted (ECF 26-27);
14
WHEREAS, on July 12, 2018, the Parties filed a stipulation to extend time to
15
respond to the Complaint, resetting Defendant’s deadline to respond to August 16,
16
2018 (ECF 32);
17
18
WHEREAS, on August 16, 2018, Defendant filed a motion to dismiss the
Complaint (ECF 37);
19
WHEREAS, in lieu of responding to said motion, and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ.
20
P. 15 (a) (1) (B), Plaintiff has until September 6, 2018 to file an Amended Complaint;
21
WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to extend Plaintiff’s deadline to file an
22
23
24
25
26
Amended Complaint to and including September 18, 2018;
WHEREAS, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15 (a) (3), Defendant would have until
October 2, 2018 to respond to an Amended Complaint filed on September 18, 2018;
WHEREAS, the Parties have further agreed to extend Defendant’s time to
respond to the Amended Complaint by one week until October 9, 2018;
27
28
1
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT, TO SET BRIEFING
SCHEDULE ON MTD, AND TO CONTINUE INITIAL CMC
Case No. 3:18-CV-3113-RS
1
WHEREAS, the Parties have further agreed to a briefing schedule, if
2
Defendant files a Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint on October 9, 2018, on
3
said motion, whereby Plaintiff’s opposition is due November 23, 2018, Defendant’s
4
reply is due December 6, 2018, and the Motion is to be noticed for December 13,
5
2018;
6
WHEREAS, the Parties have conferred and further agree that, in light of
7
Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint being filed two days prior to the currently scheduled
8
Initial Case Management Conference, the parties’ agreed upon briefing schedule on
9
a motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint, and in order to ensure the most orderly
10
and efficient management of this case, that the Initial Case Management Conference
11
should be continued from September 20, 2018 to October 25, 2018;
12
WHEREAS, the Parties have conferred and further agree that, in order to
13
facilitate management of this case, the Parties agree to exchange initial disclosures
14
pursuant to Rule 26 (a) (1) no later than October 11, 2018;
15
WHEREAS, by continuing the Initial Case Management Conference, the
16
deadline for the Parties to file a Joint Case Management Statement pursuant to
17
Local Rule 16-9 and Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) would be extended until October 18, 2018;
18
WHEREAS, other than continuing the Initial Case Management Conference,
19
agreeing to exchange initial disclosures pursuant to Rule 26 (a) (1) no later than
20
October 11, 2018, and extending the deadlines for the Rule 26 (f) Conference and
21
Joint Case Management Statement, an extension until September 18, 2018 to file an
22
Amended Complaint and the parties’ agreed briefing schedule on Defendant’s
23
Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint, if filed, will not alter the date of any
24
event or any deadline already fixed by Court Order;
25
It is therefore STIPULATED and AGREED, subject to Court approval, that:
26
1.
Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint shall be due on September 18, 2018;
27
2.
Plaintiff may file its Amended Complaint in lieu of responding to
28
Defendant’s motion to dismiss;
2
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT, TO SET BRIEFING
SCHEDULE ON MTD, AND TO CONTINUE INITIAL CMC
Case No. 3:18-CV-3113-RS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
3.
Defendant’s response to the Amended Complaint shall be due on
October 9, 2018;
4.
Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the Amended
Complaint (if filed) shall be due on November 23, 2018;
5.
Defendant’s Reply Brief in Support of its Motion to Dismiss the
Amended Complaint (if filed) shall be due on December 6, 2018;
6.
The Parties shall notice the Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint
(if filed) for December 13, 2018;
7.
The Parties shall exchange initial disclosures pursuant to Rule 26 (a)
(1) on or before October 11, 2018;
8.
The parties’ Joint Case Management Statement shall be due on October
18, 2018;
9.
The Initial Case Management Conference shall be continued until
1:30 P.M.
14
October 25, 2018 at 10:00 A.M.; and
15
10.
Any previously set deadline that conflicts with any of the foregoing is
16
hereby vacated.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT, TO SET BRIEFING
SCHEDULE ON MTD, AND TO CONTINUE INITIAL CMC
Case No. 3:18-CV-3113-RS
1
Dated:
BOCK, HATCH, LEWIS & OPPENHEIM, LLC
August 30, 2018
BY: /S/
Phillip A. Bock
2
3
Attorneys for Plaintiff TONY KRAMER,
individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated.
4
5
6
Dated:
BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP
August 30, 2018
BY: /S/ Karen L. Dunn
Karen L. Dunn
7
8
Attorneys for Defendant
FACEBOOK, INC.
9
10
11
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
12
13
DATED:
8/31/18
Hon. Richard Seeborg
United States District Court Judge
14
15
SIGNATURE ATTESTATION
16
17
18
19
Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1 (i) (3), I attest under penalty of perjury that
concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from any other
signatory to this document.
20
21
Dated:
August 30, 2018
By: /s/
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT, TO SET BRIEFING
SCHEDULE ON MTD, AND TO CONTINUE INITIAL CMC
Case No. 3:18-CV-3113-RS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?