Kramer v. Facebook, Inc.

Filing 39

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 38 TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT, TO SET BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED COMPLAINT, AND TO CONTINUE THE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Statement due by 10/18/2018. Initial Case Management Conference previously set for 9/20/2018 has been continued to 10/25/2018 at 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 03, 17th Floor. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 8/31/18. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/31/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Kathryn S. Diemer DIEMER & WEI, LLP 100 West San Fernando St. Ste. 555 San Jose, CA 95113 P: 408-971-6270 F: 408-971-6271 kdiemer@diemerwei.com Phillip A. Bock (Pro Hac Vice) Daniel J. Cohen (Pro Hac Vice) Molly E. Stemper (Pro Hac Vice) BOCK, HATCH, LEWIS & OPPENHEIM, LLC 134 N. La Salle St. Ste. 1000 Chicago, IL 60602 P: 312-658-5500 F: 312-658-5555 phil@classlawyers.com danieljaycohen209@gmail.com molly@classlawyers.com Ilan Chorowsky (Pro Hac Vice) Mark Bulgarelli (Pro Hac Vice) Adam Urbanczyk, Of Counsel (Pro Hac Vice) PROGRESSIVE LAW GROUP, LLC 1570 Oak Ave., Ste. 103 Evanston, IL 60201 P: 312-787-2717 F: 888-574-9038 Counsel for Plaintiff Tony Kramer and the Proposed Class 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 18 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 19 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 20 21 TONY KRAMER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, 22 23 24 25 v. FACEBOOK, INC., Defendant. Case No. 3:18-cv-03113-RS STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT, TO SET BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED COMPLAINT, AND TO CONTINUE THE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 26 27 28 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT, TO SET BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MTD, AND TO CONTINUE INITIAL CMC Case No. 3:18-CV-3113-RS 1 This Stipulation is entered into by and between plaintiff Tony Kramer, 2 individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated (“Plaintiff”) and defendant 3 Facebook Inc. (“Defendant”) (Plaintiff and Defendant collectively, “the Parties”) by 4 and through their respective counsel. 5 WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed a Complaint in the above-entitled action in the 6 United States District Court, Northern District of California, on May 24, 2018 and 7 served the Complaint on Defendant on May 25, 2018 (ECF 1); 8 9 WHEREAS, on June 13, 2018, the Parties filed a stipulation to extend time to respond to the Complaint, to and including July 16, 2018 (ECF 16); 10 WHEREAS, on June 28, 2018, the Parties filed a stipulation and proposed 11 order to reschedule the Initial Case Management Conference to September 20, 2018 12 and setting the deadline to file the Joint Case Management Statement to September 13 13, 2018, which the Court granted (ECF 26-27); 14 WHEREAS, on July 12, 2018, the Parties filed a stipulation to extend time to 15 respond to the Complaint, resetting Defendant’s deadline to respond to August 16, 16 2018 (ECF 32); 17 18 WHEREAS, on August 16, 2018, Defendant filed a motion to dismiss the Complaint (ECF 37); 19 WHEREAS, in lieu of responding to said motion, and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. 20 P. 15 (a) (1) (B), Plaintiff has until September 6, 2018 to file an Amended Complaint; 21 WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to extend Plaintiff’s deadline to file an 22 23 24 25 26 Amended Complaint to and including September 18, 2018; WHEREAS, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15 (a) (3), Defendant would have until October 2, 2018 to respond to an Amended Complaint filed on September 18, 2018; WHEREAS, the Parties have further agreed to extend Defendant’s time to respond to the Amended Complaint by one week until October 9, 2018; 27 28 1 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT, TO SET BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MTD, AND TO CONTINUE INITIAL CMC Case No. 3:18-CV-3113-RS 1 WHEREAS, the Parties have further agreed to a briefing schedule, if 2 Defendant files a Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint on October 9, 2018, on 3 said motion, whereby Plaintiff’s opposition is due November 23, 2018, Defendant’s 4 reply is due December 6, 2018, and the Motion is to be noticed for December 13, 5 2018; 6 WHEREAS, the Parties have conferred and further agree that, in light of 7 Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint being filed two days prior to the currently scheduled 8 Initial Case Management Conference, the parties’ agreed upon briefing schedule on 9 a motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint, and in order to ensure the most orderly 10 and efficient management of this case, that the Initial Case Management Conference 11 should be continued from September 20, 2018 to October 25, 2018; 12 WHEREAS, the Parties have conferred and further agree that, in order to 13 facilitate management of this case, the Parties agree to exchange initial disclosures 14 pursuant to Rule 26 (a) (1) no later than October 11, 2018; 15 WHEREAS, by continuing the Initial Case Management Conference, the 16 deadline for the Parties to file a Joint Case Management Statement pursuant to 17 Local Rule 16-9 and Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) would be extended until October 18, 2018; 18 WHEREAS, other than continuing the Initial Case Management Conference, 19 agreeing to exchange initial disclosures pursuant to Rule 26 (a) (1) no later than 20 October 11, 2018, and extending the deadlines for the Rule 26 (f) Conference and 21 Joint Case Management Statement, an extension until September 18, 2018 to file an 22 Amended Complaint and the parties’ agreed briefing schedule on Defendant’s 23 Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint, if filed, will not alter the date of any 24 event or any deadline already fixed by Court Order; 25 It is therefore STIPULATED and AGREED, subject to Court approval, that: 26 1. Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint shall be due on September 18, 2018; 27 2. Plaintiff may file its Amended Complaint in lieu of responding to 28 Defendant’s motion to dismiss; 2 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT, TO SET BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MTD, AND TO CONTINUE INITIAL CMC Case No. 3:18-CV-3113-RS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 3. Defendant’s response to the Amended Complaint shall be due on October 9, 2018; 4. Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint (if filed) shall be due on November 23, 2018; 5. Defendant’s Reply Brief in Support of its Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint (if filed) shall be due on December 6, 2018; 6. The Parties shall notice the Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint (if filed) for December 13, 2018; 7. The Parties shall exchange initial disclosures pursuant to Rule 26 (a) (1) on or before October 11, 2018; 8. The parties’ Joint Case Management Statement shall be due on October 18, 2018; 9. The Initial Case Management Conference shall be continued until 1:30 P.M. 14 October 25, 2018 at 10:00 A.M.; and 15 10. Any previously set deadline that conflicts with any of the foregoing is 16 hereby vacated. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT, TO SET BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MTD, AND TO CONTINUE INITIAL CMC Case No. 3:18-CV-3113-RS 1 Dated: BOCK, HATCH, LEWIS & OPPENHEIM, LLC August 30, 2018 BY: /S/ Phillip A. Bock 2 3 Attorneys for Plaintiff TONY KRAMER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated. 4 5 6 Dated: BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP August 30, 2018 BY: /S/ Karen L. Dunn Karen L. Dunn 7 8 Attorneys for Defendant FACEBOOK, INC. 9 10 11 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 13 DATED: 8/31/18 Hon. Richard Seeborg United States District Court Judge 14 15 SIGNATURE ATTESTATION 16 17 18 19 Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1 (i) (3), I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from any other signatory to this document. 20 21 Dated: August 30, 2018 By: /s/ 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT, TO SET BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MTD, AND TO CONTINUE INITIAL CMC Case No. 3:18-CV-3113-RS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?