Levi Strauss & Co. v. Dorsaz, Inc. et al

Filing 22

Order by Judge William H. Orrick granting 21 Stipulation of Dismissal as to Defendant Nanal, Inc. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/12/2018)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP
GREGORY S. GILCHRIST (State Bar No. 111536)
RYAN T. BRICKER (State Bar No. 269100)
GIA L. CINCONE (State Bar No. 141668)
CALLA E. YEE (State Bar No. 306652)
Two Embarcadero Center, Suite 1900
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-Mail:
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
LEVI STRAUSS & CO.

9
10
11
12
13
14

GEORGE E. ROBINSON (State Bar No. 236849)
LAW OFFICES OF P. STERLING KERR
2450 St. Rose Parkway, Suite 120
Henderson, Nevada 89074
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-Mail:
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant
NANAL, INC.

15
16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

17

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

18
19

LEVI STRAUSS & CO.,

20

Plaintiff,

21
22

v.

Case No. 3:18-cv-03240-WHO
JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
AS TO DEFENDANT NANAL, INC.;
ORDER

DORSAZ, INC. and NANAL, INC.,

23

Defendants.

Complaint filed May 31, 2018
Judge: Honorable William H. Orrick

24
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), in light of the settlement of all

25
26

matters in controversy between Plaintiff Levi Strauss & Co. (“LS&Co.”) and Defendant Nanal, Inc.

27

(“Nanal”), LS&Co. and Nanal hereby jointly stipulate to dismissal without prejudice of all claims in

28

/ / /
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AS TO DEFENDANT NANAL, INC.;
ORDER – Case No. 3:18-cv-03240-WHO

-1-

1

this action asserted by LS&Co. against Nanal, and thereby move for an order dismissing Nanal from

2

this action, with each party to bear its own costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees.

3
4

Dated: December 12, 2018

5

Respectfully submitted,
KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP

6
7

By:

8

/s/ Ryan T. Bricker
Ryan T. Bricker

Attorneys for Plaintiff
LEVI STRAUSS & CO.

9
10
11

Dated: December 12, 2018

LAW OFFICES OF P. STERLING KERR

12
13

By:

/s/ George E. Robinson
George E. Robinson

14
15

Attorneys for Defendant
NANAL, INC.

16
17
18
19
20

ATTESTATION REGARDING SIGNATURES
Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3) regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of perjury that
concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatory.

21
/s/ Ryan T. Bricker
Ryan T. Bricker

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AS TO DEFENDANT NANAL, INC.;
ORDER – Case No. 3:18-cv-03240-WHO

-2-

1

ORDER

2

Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS ORDERED that all claims asserted by Plaintiff Levi Strauss &

3

Co. against Defendant Nanal, Inc., are hereby dismissed without prejudice. Each party shall bear its

4

own costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees.

5

IT IS SO ORDERED.

6
7

Dated: December 12, 2018

8
9
William H. Orrick
United States District Judge

10
11
12

71340684V.1

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AS TO DEFENDANT NANAL, INC.;
ORDER – Case No. 3:18-cv-03240-WHO

-3-