Prime Mechanical Service, Inc. v. Federal Solutions Group, Inc. et al

Filing 40

ORDER DISMISSING FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on November 28, 2018. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/28/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 PRIME MECHANICAL SERVICE, INC., Plaintiff, 8 11 ORDER DISMISSING FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION v. 9 10 Case No. 18-cv-03307-MMC FEDERAL SOLUTIONS GROUP, INC., et al., United States District Court Northern District of California Defendants. 12 13 By order filed concurrently herewith, the Court has dismissed the sole claim over 14 which the Court has original jurisdiction, specifically, the Second Cause of Action, 15 wherein plaintiff asserted a claim under 40 U.S.C. 3133(b) against defendant Indemnity 16 Company of California. The remaining claim, the First Cause of Action, alleges a state 17 law claim for breach of contract against defendant Federal Solutions Group, Inc. (“FSG”), 18 a claim as to which the Court’s jurisdiction is supplemental in nature. See 28 U.S.C. § 19 1367(a). 20 Where, as here, the district court has “dismiss[ed] all claims over which it has 21 original jurisdiction,” such court may decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the 22 remaining state law claims. See 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3). In this instance, as the case 23 has not progressed past the pleading stage, FSG has not appeared, and there are no 24 apparent considerations weighing in favor of retaining jurisdiction over the state law 25 claim, the Court finds it appropriate to decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over 26 the First Cause of Action. See Carnegie-Mellon Univ. v. Cohill, 484 U.S. 343, 350 (1988) 27 (holding “when the federal-law claims have dropped out of the lawsuit in its early stages 28 and only state-law claims remain,” federal courts ordinarily “should decline the exercise of 1 2 3 4 jurisdiction by dismissing the case without prejudice”). Accordingly, the First Cause of Action is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice to plaintiff’s refiling said claim in state court. IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 Dated: November 28, 2018 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?