Cohea v. Ducart et al
Filing
37
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 5/13/2020. (lsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/13/2020)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
DANNY JAMES COHEA, J13647,
Plaintiff,
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
v.
Case No. 18-cv-03349-CRB (PR)
(9th Cir. Case No. 20-15786)
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
C. E. DUCART, et al.,
Defendant(s).
On March 30, 2020, the court granted defendants’ motion to revoke plaintiff’s in forma
13
pauperis (IFP) status pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and gave plaintiff 28 days to pay the
14
requisite $400.00 filing fee. The court made clear that “[f]ailure to pay the filing fee within the
15
designated time will result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice to bringing it in a new
16
paid complaint.” Mar. 30, 2020 Order (ECF No. 32) at 5.
17
More than 28 days have passed yet plaintiff has not paid the filing fee or sought an
18
extension of time to do so; rather, he opted to file a notice of appeal of the court’s March 30, 2020
19
order. See ECF No. 34. The instant action is DISMISSED without prejudice to bringing it in a
20
new paid complaint.
21
The clerk shall serve a copy of this order on the parties and on the Ninth Circuit.
22
IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: May 13, 2020
______________________________________
CHARLES R. BREYER
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?