Vu v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company

Filing 69

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Suan Illston on 7/8/19. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/8/2019)

1

5

BLAKE J. RUSSUM (SBN 258031)
JACLYN D. CONOVER (SBN 266749)
ROPERS, MAJESKI, KOHN & BENTLEY
1001 Marshall Street, Suite 500
Redwood City, CA 94063
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email:
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

6

Attorneys for Defendants

2
3
4

7

LIBERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION and
LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
A Professional Corporation
Redwood City

Ropers Majeski Kohn & Bentley

8

11

TAM VU, an individual,
Plaintiff,

12
v.

13
14
15
16

CASE NO. 18-CV-03594-SI
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE AND ORDER

LIBERTY INSURANCE
CORPORATION and LIBERTY
MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, and
Does 1 through 20,
Defendants.

17
18
19

TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES, AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

20

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the Plaintiff, TAM VU, and

21

Defendants LIBERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION and LIBERTY MUTUAL

22

INSURANCE COMPANY, by and through their respective attorneys of record, that the above-

23

captioned action shall be, and hereby is, dismissed with prejudice as to all parties and claims,

24

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Each party shall bear its own fees

25

and costs.
All signatories to this Stipulation, and all parties on whose behalf the filing is submitted,

26
27

concur with the Stipulation’s content and have authorized its filing.

28

//
4838-2918-0572.1

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER; CASE NO. 4:18CV03594-SI

1
2

Dated: July 8, 2019

ROPERS, MAJESKI, KOHN & BENTLEY

3

By: /s/ Blake J. Russum
BLAKE J. RUSSUM
JACLYN D. CONOVER
Attorneys for Defendants, LIBERTY

4
5

INSURANCE CORPORATION and
LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE
COMPANY

6
7

9

Dated: July 8, 2019

KERLEY SCHAFFER, LLP

10
A Professional Corporation
Redwood City

Ropers Majeski Kohn & Bentley

8

By: /s/ Dylan L. Schaffer
DYLAN L. SCHAFFER
Attorneys for Plaintiff

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

ORDER
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, pursuant to the parties’ Stipulation for Dismissal of
Action with Prejudice and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), this action shall be,
and hereby is, dismissed with prejudice in its entirety as to all claims and parties. Each party
shall bear its own attorney’s fees and costs.
Dated: ________7/8/19________________ _________________________________________
United States District Judge

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4838-2918-0572.1

-2-

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER; CASE NO. 4:18CV03594-SI