Bolin v. Davis
Filing
7
ORDER DISMISSING PETITION AND CLOSING CASE. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 6/28/2018. (lsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/28/2018)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
PAUL C. BOLIN, E88100,
Petitioner,
8
9
10
ORDER DISMISSING PETITION
AND CLOSING CASE
v.
RONALD DAVIS, Warden,
Respondent.
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Case No. 18-cv-03619-CRB (PR)
12
13
Petitioner, a state prisoner at San Quentin State Prison’s (SQSP) death row, has filed a pro
14
se second or successive petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenging his 1991 conviction and
15
death sentence from Kern County Superior Court. His first petition was denied on the merits by
16
the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California on June 9, 2016. See Bolin
17
v. Davis, No. 1:99-cv-05279-LJO-SAB (E.D. Cal. June 9, 2016) (ECF Nos. 350 & 351).
18
Petitioner asserts that the instant petition is brought “pursuant to [the] doctrine of
19
acquiescence” and “not [under] 28 U.S.C. § 2254,” ECF No. 1 at 3, because he does not want to
20
be subjected to the requirements applicable to § 2254 actions, such as an order from the Ninth
21
Circuit authorizing the district court to consider a second or successive petition, see 28 U.S.C. §
22
2244(b)(3)(A).
23
24
25
26
27
28
Unfortunately for petitioner, it is well established that Ҥ 2254 is the exclusive avenue for a
state court prisoner to challenge the constitutionality of his detention.” White v. Lambert, 370 F.3d
1002, 1007 (9th Cir. 2004), overruled on other grounds by Hayward v. Marshall, 603 F.3d 546,
553-54 (9th Cir. 2010) (en banc). When a state “‘prisoner begins in the district court, § 2254 and
all associated statutory requirements apply no matter what [] label the prisoner has given the
case.’” Id. (quoting Walker v. O’Brien, 216 F.3d 626, 723 (7th Cir. 2000)).
1
The cou will not construe the instant petit
urt
c
tion as an action under § 2254 becau petitioner
use
r
2
ma
akes clear tha he is not bringing this action unde § 2254. B because p
at
b
er
But
petitioner’s e
exclusive
3
ave
enue for challenging his state court conviction an death sen
c
nd
ntence is an a
action under § 2254, and
r
d
4
pet
titioner alrea has soug and been denied relie under § 22 in the Ea
ady
ght
ef
254
astern District of
5
California, the instant petit
tion is DISM
MISSED with
hout prejudic to his seeking an orde from the
ce
er
6
nth
a
he
tates District Court for th Eastern D
t
he
District of Ca
alifornia to
Nin Circuit authorizing th United St
7
con
nsider a seco or successive petition under § 22
ond
254.
8
The cle is instructed to close the case and terminate a pending m
erk
d
all
motions as m
moot.
9
IT IS SO ORDER
S
RED.
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
Da
ated: June 28 2018
8,
___
__________
___________
__________
________
CH
HARLES R. BREYER
Un
nited States D
District Judg
ge
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
1
2
3
UNITED STATES D
D
DISTRICT C
COURT
4
NORTHER DISTRIC OF CALI
RN
CT
IFORNIA
5
6
PA
AUL C BOL
LIN,
Case No. 3
3:18-cv-03619-CRB
Plaintiff,
7
v.
CERTIFIC
CATE OF S
SERVICE
8
9
RONALD DA
AVIS,
.
Defendant.
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
I, the un
ndersigned, hereby certify that I am an employe in the Offi of the Clerk, U.S.
ee
ice
Dis
strict Court, Northern Di
istrict of Cal
lifornia.
13
14
15
16
17
That on June 28, 20 I SERV
n
018,
VED a true an correct co
nd
opy(ies) of t attached, by placing
the
said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelo addressed to the pers
i
ope
d
son(s) herein
nafter listed, by
dep
positing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by pla
d
n
M
acing said co
opy(ies) into an inter-off delivery
o
ffice
y
rec
ceptacle loca in the Cl
ated
lerk's office.
.
18
19
20
Pau C Bolin ID E-88100
ul
D:
SQ
QSP
San Quentin St Prison
n
tate
San Quentin, CA 94974
n
C
21
22
23
24
ated: June 28 2018
8,
Da
Su
usan Y. Soon
ng
Cl
lerk, United States Distr Court
d
rict
25
26
27
By
y:_________
___________
_______
La
ashanda Sco Deputy C
ott,
Clerk to the
H
Honorable CH
HARLES R. BREYER
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?