Bolin v. Davis

Filing 7

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION AND CLOSING CASE. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 6/28/2018. (lsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/28/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 PAUL C. BOLIN, E88100, Petitioner, 8 9 10 ORDER DISMISSING PETITION AND CLOSING CASE v. RONALD DAVIS, Warden, Respondent. 11 United States District Court Northern District of California Case No. 18-cv-03619-CRB (PR) 12 13 Petitioner, a state prisoner at San Quentin State Prison’s (SQSP) death row, has filed a pro 14 se second or successive petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenging his 1991 conviction and 15 death sentence from Kern County Superior Court. His first petition was denied on the merits by 16 the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California on June 9, 2016. See Bolin 17 v. Davis, No. 1:99-cv-05279-LJO-SAB (E.D. Cal. June 9, 2016) (ECF Nos. 350 & 351). 18 Petitioner asserts that the instant petition is brought “pursuant to [the] doctrine of 19 acquiescence” and “not [under] 28 U.S.C. § 2254,” ECF No. 1 at 3, because he does not want to 20 be subjected to the requirements applicable to § 2254 actions, such as an order from the Ninth 21 Circuit authorizing the district court to consider a second or successive petition, see 28 U.S.C. § 22 2244(b)(3)(A). 23 24 25 26 27 28 Unfortunately for petitioner, it is well established that “§ 2254 is the exclusive avenue for a state court prisoner to challenge the constitutionality of his detention.” White v. Lambert, 370 F.3d 1002, 1007 (9th Cir. 2004), overruled on other grounds by Hayward v. Marshall, 603 F.3d 546, 553-54 (9th Cir. 2010) (en banc). When a state “‘prisoner begins in the district court, § 2254 and all associated statutory requirements apply no matter what [] label the prisoner has given the case.’” Id. (quoting Walker v. O’Brien, 216 F.3d 626, 723 (7th Cir. 2000)). 1 The cou will not construe the instant petit urt c tion as an action under § 2254 becau petitioner use r 2 ma akes clear tha he is not bringing this action unde § 2254. B because p at b er But petitioner’s e exclusive 3 ave enue for challenging his state court conviction an death sen c nd ntence is an a action under § 2254, and r d 4 pet titioner alrea has soug and been denied relie under § 22 in the Ea ady ght ef 254 astern District of 5 California, the instant petit tion is DISM MISSED with hout prejudic to his seeking an orde from the ce er 6 nth a he tates District Court for th Eastern D t he District of Ca alifornia to Nin Circuit authorizing th United St 7 con nsider a seco or successive petition under § 22 ond 254. 8 The cle is instructed to close the case and terminate a pending m erk d all motions as m moot. 9 IT IS SO ORDER S RED. 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 Da ated: June 28 2018 8, ___ __________ ___________ __________ ________ CH HARLES R. BREYER Un nited States D District Judg ge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 1 2 3 UNITED STATES D D DISTRICT C COURT 4 NORTHER DISTRIC OF CALI RN CT IFORNIA 5 6 PA AUL C BOL LIN, Case No. 3 3:18-cv-03619-CRB Plaintiff, 7 v. CERTIFIC CATE OF S SERVICE 8 9 RONALD DA AVIS, . Defendant. 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 I, the un ndersigned, hereby certify that I am an employe in the Offi of the Clerk, U.S. ee ice Dis strict Court, Northern Di istrict of Cal lifornia. 13 14 15 16 17 That on June 28, 20 I SERV n 018, VED a true an correct co nd opy(ies) of t attached, by placing the said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelo addressed to the pers i ope d son(s) herein nafter listed, by dep positing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by pla d n M acing said co opy(ies) into an inter-off delivery o ffice y rec ceptacle loca in the Cl ated lerk's office. . 18 19 20 Pau C Bolin ID E-88100 ul D: SQ QSP San Quentin St Prison n tate San Quentin, CA 94974 n C 21 22 23 24 ated: June 28 2018 8, Da Su usan Y. Soon ng Cl lerk, United States Distr Court d rict 25 26 27 By y:_________ ___________ _______ La ashanda Sco Deputy C ott, Clerk to the H Honorable CH HARLES R. BREYER 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?