Teradata Corporation et al v. SAP SE et al

Filing 313

Order by Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero regarding 295 Discovery Letter Brief. (jcslc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/9/2020)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
TERADATA CORPORATION, et al.,

7

Plaintiffs,

8

v.

9

SAP SE, et al.,

10

Defendants.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

Case No. 18-cv-03670-WHO (JCS)
ORDER GRANTING IN PART
DISCOVERY MOTION
Re: Dkt. No. 295

12
13
14

I.

INTRODUCTION
Teradata and SAP have jointly filed a letter describing discovery matters which remain in

15

dispute (the “Motion”). Dkt. 295. The court held a hearing on October 9, 2020, and for good

16

cause the Motion is GRANTED IN PART follows:

17

1. SAP must supplement its responses, complete with all information currently in its

18

possession, to Teradata contention Interrogatory Nos. 7–11 by October 12, 2020.

19

2. Teradata must supplement its responses, complete with all information currently in its

20

possession, to SAP contention Interrogatories by October 12, 2020.

21

3. For Rule 30(b)(6) depositions, the parties shall follow the following procedure: SAP

22

must designate its Rule 30(b)(6) designees. In response, Teradata must identify any

23

Rule 30(b)(6) designee whom it wishes to depose in an individual capacity. Any such

24

witness must be deposed first in his or her capacity as a Rule 30(b)(6) designee and

25

second in his or her individual capacity. So long as the depositions occur in that order,

26

they may be held on the same day.

27
28

4. At least five days before any Rule 30(b)(6) deposition, SAP must designate the topics
on which each Rule 30(b)(6) designee will testify.

1
2
3
4
5
6

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 9, 2020.
______________________________________
JOSEPH C. SPERO
Chief Magistrate Judge

7
8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2