Teradata Corporation et al v. SAP SE et al

Filing 316

Order by Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero regarding 291 Discovery Letter Brief. (jcslc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/10/2020)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 TERADATA CORPORATION, et al., Plaintiffs, 8 9 10 ORDER GRANTING IN PART DISCOVERY MOTION v. SAP SE, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 291 Defendants. 11 United States District Court Northern District of California Case No. 18-cv-03670-WHO (JCS) 12 13 Teradata and nonparty Oracle have jointly filed a letter describing discovery matters which 14 remain in dispute (the “Motion”). Dkt. 291. The court held a hearing on October 9, 2020, and for 15 good cause the Motion is GRANTED IN PART follows: 16 1. Re: Request 1: In addition to searching its other repositories, Oracle must search the 17 electronically stored information of the heads of marketing (and the heads of marketing for 18 each product, if one exists or existed) since 2011 and produce responsive documents for 19 the seven products discussed at the hearing (as to which Teradata narrowed its subpoena as 20 reflected in the joint letter at page 3). 21 22 23 2. Re: Request 2: Oracle must search the repositories of its Competitive Intelligence Group and produce responsive documents with respect to the seven products. 3. Re: Request 3: Oracle must query its customer relationship management databases for 24 information sought in the Request for each of the seven products since 2011 and produce 25 that information. 26 4. Re: Request 4: For each of the seven products for each year since 2011, Oracle must 27 produce annual revenue information for each of its top 25 customers by annual revenue per 28 product 1 2 5. Re: Requests 5–6: Oracle must search Mr. Kuppler’s electronically stored information and produce responsive documents. 3 6. Re: Request 7: For three products to be determined by Teradata, Oracle must identify its 4 customer relationship manager(s) for each of its top 25 customers by annual revenue per 5 product since 2011. Oracle must search these employees’ electronically stored information 6 and produce responsive documents. 7 8 9 7. Teradata is not required to reimburse Oracle for its costs incurred in connection with this production. 8. The parties and Oracle shall meet and confer and agree upon a procedure by which Oracle may designate confidential material and object prior to the public disclosure of any such 11 United States District Court Northern District of California 10 material at a hearing or at trial. 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 14 15 Dated: October 10, 2020 ______________________________________ JOSEPH C. SPERO Chief Magistrate Judge 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?