Drevaleva v. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs et al
Filing
51
ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING by Judge William Alsup [denying 42 Motion for Leave to File]. (whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/2/2018)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
TATYANA EVGENIEVNA DREVALEVA,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
No. C 18-03748 WHA
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS, et al.,
ORDER DENYING
REQUEST TO FILE
SUPPLEMENTAL
BRIEFING
v.
Defendants.
/
16
17
In this pro se employment discrimination action, defendants filed a motion to dismiss
18
pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6). Plaintiff filed her opposition and defendants
19
responded (Dkt. Nos. 40, 41). Plaintiff now requests leave to file supplemental briefing
20
pursuant to Local Rule 7-3(d).
21
Local Rule 7-3(d) states, “[o]nce a reply is filed, no additional memoranda, papers,
22
or letters may be filed with the court without prior approval” unless new evidence has been
23
submitted in the reply or relevant judicial opinions were published after the reply or opposition
24
was filed. Neither exception applies here.
25
Plaintiff alleges that defendants raised new issues in their reply that were not present
26
in their motion to dismiss. Plaintiff, however, fails to identify these new issues and does not
27
explain what information she found to be “misleading” in defendants’ reply (Dkt. No. 42 at 1).
28
Plaintiff has already had the opportunity to present arguments and cite to case law in her
1
opposition and various other requests and motions she has submitted. The Court finds no basis
2
for permitting additional briefing, thus, plaintiff's request for leave to file a supplemental brief is
3
hereby DENIED.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
Dated: November 2, 2018.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?