Drevaleva v. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs et al

Filing 63

ORDER REVOKING IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS ON APPEAL (re 58 ). Signed by Judge Alsup on 11/26/2018. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/26/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 TATYANA EVGENIEVNA DREVALEVA, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 No. C 18-03748 WHA Plaintiff, v. ORDER REVOKING IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS ON APPEAL U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, et al., Defendants. / 16 17 An order dated November 19 denied pro se plaintiff’s request for appointment of 18 counsel under Bradshawe v. Zoological Soc’y of San Diego, 662 F.2d 1301, 1318 (9th Cir. 19 1981), for failure to produce evidence of her efforts to secure counsel (Dkt. No. 57). Plaintiff 20 subsequently appealed that denial (Dkt. No. 58). 21 Now, our court of appeals has referred plaintiff’s appeal to the district court to determine 22 whether plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status should continue on appeal. In Hooker v. American 23 Airlines, 302 F.3d 1091, 1092 (9th Cir. 2002), our court of appeals held that revocation of in 24 forma pauperis status is appropriate where the district court finds the appeal to be frivolous. 25 Here, instead of moving for leave for reconsideration or making any kind of attempt to 26 produce evidence before the Court of her efforts to secure counsel, plaintiff immediately 27 appealed the denial of appointment of counsel. Without such evidence of plaintiff’s efforts to 28 secure counsel, plaintiff is not entitled to appointment of counsel. And, although plaintiff is proceeding pro se, she is readily capable of supplementing to the Court any noted deficiencies 1 in her requests (see Dkt. No. 53). Accordingly, this order finds plaintiff’s present appeal to be 2 frivolous and hereby REVOKES plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status. This revocation is without 3 prejudice to any subsequent appeals made by plaintiff. The Clerk shall please notify the United 4 States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit of this order. 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 8 Dated: November 26, 2018. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?