Drevaleva v. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs et al
Filing
63
ORDER REVOKING IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS ON APPEAL (re 58 ). Signed by Judge Alsup on 11/26/2018. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/26/2018)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
TATYANA EVGENIEVNA DREVALEVA,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
No. C 18-03748 WHA
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER REVOKING IN
FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS
ON APPEAL
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS, et al.,
Defendants.
/
16
17
An order dated November 19 denied pro se plaintiff’s request for appointment of
18
counsel under Bradshawe v. Zoological Soc’y of San Diego, 662 F.2d 1301, 1318 (9th Cir.
19
1981), for failure to produce evidence of her efforts to secure counsel (Dkt. No. 57). Plaintiff
20
subsequently appealed that denial (Dkt. No. 58).
21
Now, our court of appeals has referred plaintiff’s appeal to the district court to determine
22
whether plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status should continue on appeal. In Hooker v. American
23
Airlines, 302 F.3d 1091, 1092 (9th Cir. 2002), our court of appeals held that revocation of in
24
forma pauperis status is appropriate where the district court finds the appeal to be frivolous.
25
Here, instead of moving for leave for reconsideration or making any kind of attempt to
26
produce evidence before the Court of her efforts to secure counsel, plaintiff immediately
27
appealed the denial of appointment of counsel. Without such evidence of plaintiff’s efforts to
28
secure counsel, plaintiff is not entitled to appointment of counsel. And, although plaintiff is
proceeding pro se, she is readily capable of supplementing to the Court any noted deficiencies
1
in her requests (see Dkt. No. 53). Accordingly, this order finds plaintiff’s present appeal to be
2
frivolous and hereby REVOKES plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status. This revocation is without
3
prejudice to any subsequent appeals made by plaintiff. The Clerk shall please notify the United
4
States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit of this order.
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
8
Dated: November 26, 2018.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?