Zoellner v. City of Arcata et al

Filing 368

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR MORE TIME re 366 Trial Brief filed by Kyle Christopher Zoellner. Signed by Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 10/10/2022. (jsclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/10/2022)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 KYLE CHRISTOPHER ZOELLNER, 7 Plaintiff, 8 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR MORE TIME v. 9 ERIC LOSEY, 10 Re: Dkt. No. 366 Defendant. 11 United States District Court Northern District of California Case No. 18-cv-04471-JSC 12 Plaintiff’s last-minute request to give him an additional 1.5 hours for direct and cross 13 14 examination is DENIED. At the pretrial conference on September 15, 2022, the Court advised the parties that each 15 16 would have 9 hours for direct and cross examination. The hours limit was memorialized in an 17 order the following day. (Dkt. No. 306 at 12.) Plaintiff did not object. Trial commenced on 18 October 3, 2022. After non-party Maggie Fleming testified, the Court sua sponte gave Plaintiff, 19 but not Defendant, an additional 30 minutes in light of the difference between Ms. Fleming’s 20 deposition testimony and trial testimony. During trial the Court repeatedly advised Plaintiff how 21 much time he had used and warned that he was running out of time. Further, Plaintiff’s insistence 22 that the additional time will not impact the trial schedule is wrong. If the Court were to give 23 Plaintiff the additional time sought, the case could not get to the jury on October 11, 2022 as 24 planned. Such delay enhances the risk of mistrial as one juror already had to be excused due to a 25 positive Covid test. As stated on October 7, 2022, Plaintiff has 25 minutes remaining. 26 27 // 28 // 1 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 10, 2022 3 4 JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY United States District Judge 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?