Zoellner v. City of Arcata et al
Filing
368
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR MORE TIME re 366 Trial Brief filed by Kyle Christopher Zoellner. Signed by Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 10/10/2022. (jsclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/10/2022)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
KYLE CHRISTOPHER ZOELLNER,
7
Plaintiff,
8
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
REQUEST FOR MORE TIME
v.
9
ERIC LOSEY,
10
Re: Dkt. No. 366
Defendant.
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Case No. 18-cv-04471-JSC
12
Plaintiff’s last-minute request to give him an additional 1.5 hours for direct and cross
13
14
examination is DENIED.
At the pretrial conference on September 15, 2022, the Court advised the parties that each
15
16
would have 9 hours for direct and cross examination. The hours limit was memorialized in an
17
order the following day. (Dkt. No. 306 at 12.) Plaintiff did not object. Trial commenced on
18
October 3, 2022. After non-party Maggie Fleming testified, the Court sua sponte gave Plaintiff,
19
but not Defendant, an additional 30 minutes in light of the difference between Ms. Fleming’s
20
deposition testimony and trial testimony. During trial the Court repeatedly advised Plaintiff how
21
much time he had used and warned that he was running out of time. Further, Plaintiff’s insistence
22
that the additional time will not impact the trial schedule is wrong. If the Court were to give
23
Plaintiff the additional time sought, the case could not get to the jury on October 11, 2022 as
24
planned. Such delay enhances the risk of mistrial as one juror already had to be excused due to a
25
positive Covid test.
As stated on October 7, 2022, Plaintiff has 25 minutes remaining.
26
27
//
28
//
1
2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 10, 2022
3
4
JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY
United States District Judge
5
6
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?