Russell v. Maman et al

Filing 306

SECOND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Order to Show Cause Hearing remains set for 6/15/2023 at 01:30 PM. Show Cause Response due by 6/1/2023. Signed by Chief Judge Richard Seeborg on 5/19/2023. (rslc2, COURT STAFF) Copy of Order emailed to Pro Se Plaintif f Stephen Russell. (Filed on 5/19/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) Modified on 5/19/2023 (cl, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 STEPHEN RUSSELL, Case No. 18-cv-06691-RS Plaintiff, 11 United States District Court Northern District of California v. SECOND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 12 13 NIR MAMAN, et al., Defendants. 14 15 16 Due to his as yet unexplained absence from the case management conference on April 20, 17 2023, Plaintiff was ordered to file a response to show why the case should not be dismissed for 18 failure to prosecute by May 18, 2023, and an attendant hearing was scheduled for June 15, 2023. 19 Plaintiff has failed to file his response before the deadline. In light of the impending hearing, and 20 mindful of Plaintiff’s current pro se status, Plaintiff is given until June 1, 2023 to file his response 21 to the Order to Show Cause. If Plaintiff either again fails to file his response by the deadline, or 22 fails to appear for the hearing on June 15, 2023, the case will be dismissed for failure to prosecute. 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 27 28 Dated: May 19, 2023 ______________________________________ RICHARD SEEBORG Chief United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?