SC Innovations, Inc. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 20

ORDER re 15 Administrative Motion. Defendant's deadline to respond to the complaint is provisionally extended to January 17, 2019. Plaintiff shall respond to the administrative motion pursuant to Local Rule 7-11. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero on January 8, 2019. (jcslc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/8/2019)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 SC INNOVATIONS, INC., Plaintiff, 6 7 8 9 10 Case No. 18-cv-07440-JCS v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., Defendants. ORDER REGARDING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Re: Dkt. No. 15 On January 7, 2019 Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. (“Uber”) filed an administrative United States District Court Northern District of California 11 motion for an extension of time to respond to the complaint filed by Plaintiff SC Innovations, Inc. 12 (“Sidecar”), the deadline for which is currently January 10, 2019, to allow Uber time to file a 13 motion to disqualify Sidecar’s counsel based on that law firm’s prior work on behalf of Uber. 14 Uber contends that resolving the motion to disqualify before requiring a response to the complaint 15 might avoid unnecessary work if counsel is disqualified and the present complaint is stricken as a 16 result of that disqualification. Uber requests a briefing schedule beginning in February and 17 extending into March, with the deadline to respond to the complaint stayed until the motion is 18 resolved. Based on the imminent current deadline to respond to the complaint, Uber asks the 19 Court to shorten time for Sidecar to respond to the administrative motion. 20 Rather than shorten the deadline for Sidecar to respond to the present motion, the Court 21 hereby extends Uber’s deadline to respond to the complaint by one week, to January 17, 2019, as a 22 provisional measure to allow time to consider Uber’s administrative motion. Sidecar shall 23 respond to Uber’s administrative motion in due course no later than January 11, 2019. See Civ. 24 L.R. 7-11(b). The Court will address Uber’s administrative motion after Sidecar files its response. 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 8, 2019 ______________________________________ JOSEPH C. SPERO Chief Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?