SC Innovations, Inc. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
ORDER re 15 Administrative Motion. Defendant's deadline to respond to the complaint is provisionally extended to January 17, 2019. Plaintiff shall respond to the administrative motion pursuant to Local Rule 7-11. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero on January 8, 2019. (jcslc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/8/2019)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SC INNOVATIONS, INC.,
Case No. 18-cv-07440-JCS
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO
EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO
Re: Dkt. No. 15
On January 7, 2019 Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. (“Uber”) filed an administrative
United States District Court
Northern District of California
motion for an extension of time to respond to the complaint filed by Plaintiff SC Innovations, Inc.
(“Sidecar”), the deadline for which is currently January 10, 2019, to allow Uber time to file a
motion to disqualify Sidecar’s counsel based on that law firm’s prior work on behalf of Uber.
Uber contends that resolving the motion to disqualify before requiring a response to the complaint
might avoid unnecessary work if counsel is disqualified and the present complaint is stricken as a
result of that disqualification. Uber requests a briefing schedule beginning in February and
extending into March, with the deadline to respond to the complaint stayed until the motion is
resolved. Based on the imminent current deadline to respond to the complaint, Uber asks the
Court to shorten time for Sidecar to respond to the administrative motion.
Rather than shorten the deadline for Sidecar to respond to the present motion, the Court
hereby extends Uber’s deadline to respond to the complaint by one week, to January 17, 2019, as a
provisional measure to allow time to consider Uber’s administrative motion. Sidecar shall
respond to Uber’s administrative motion in due course no later than January 11, 2019. See Civ.
L.R. 7-11(b). The Court will address Uber’s administrative motion after Sidecar files its response.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 8, 2019
JOSEPH C. SPERO
Chief Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?