Electronics For Imaging, Inc. v. RAH Color Technologies LLC

Filing 94

ORDER TO COMPLY WITH CIVIL LOCAL RULE 79-5(f) (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 8/26/2019)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7
8

IN RE: RAH COLOR TECHNOLOGIES
LLC PATENT LITIGATION

Case Nos. 18-md-02874-SI
18-cv-07465-SI
ORDER TO COMPLY WITH CIVIL
LOCAL RULE 79-5(f)

9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
This Order Relates to:
13
14
15

Electronics for Imaging, Inc. v. RAH Color
Technologies LLC, Case No. 18-cv-07465SI

16
17
In conjunction with the motion by RAH Color Technologies LLC to dismiss Counts 3 and 4
18
from the third amended complaint of Electronics for Imaging, Inc., the parties filed numerous
19
administrative motions to seal portions of the motion, opposition, and reply briefs, along with
20
motions to seal various exhibits as well as the declaration of Toby Weiss. Case No. 18-cv-7465,
21
Dkt. Nos. 74, 77, 79, 83, 84. The Court informed the parties at the hearing on August 16, 2019, that
22
the Court would deny the motions to seal, and the denial was memorialized in the minute entry
23
issued that same day. Case No. 18-cv-7465, Dkt. No. 91.
24
Civil Local Rule 79-5(f) states that if an administrative motion to seal is denied in its entirety,
25
26

“the document sought to be sealed will not be considered by the Court unless the Submitting Party
files an unredacted version of the document within 7 days after the motion is denied.” Thus, if the

27
parties wished for the Court to consider their briefs and exhibits, they were to have filed unredacted
28

1

versions by August 23, 2019.

2

RAH’s motion to dismiss is still pending, and given the extent of the redactions in the briefs

3

and supporting exhibits, the Court will not issue its ruling until the parties comply with Civil Local

4

Rule 79-5(f). The parties shall comply with the local rules by publicly filing on the Court’s docket

5

unredacted versions of the documents previously sought to be sealed no later than August 28,

6

2019.

7
8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 26, 2019
______________________________________
SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2