State of California et al v. Trump et al
Filing
5
Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 5/14/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 5/21/2019 10:00 AM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 2/19/19. (aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/19/2019)
Case 3:19-cv-00872-EDL Document 5 Filed 02/19/19 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,
Case No. 19-cv-00872-EDL
Plaintiffs,
7
v.
8
9
DONALD J. TRUMP, et al.,
ORDER SETTING INITIAL CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
AND ADR DEADLINES
Defendants.
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is assigned to the Honorable Elizabeth D.
13
Laporte . When serving the complaint or notice of removal, the plaintiff or removing defendant
14
must serve on all other parties a copy of this order, the Notice of Assignment of Case to a United
15
States Magistrate Judge for Trial, and all other documents specified in Civil Local Rule 4-2.
16
Plaintiffs or removing parties must file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate
17
judge within 14 days of the filing of the complaint or the removal. All other parties must file a
18
consent or declination within 14 days of appearing in the case. All parties who have made an
19
appearance must file a consent or declination within 7 days of the filing of a dispositive motion or
20
the case will be reassigned to a district court judge. Counsel must comply with the case schedule
21
listed below unless the Court otherwise orders.
22
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is assigned to the Alternative Dispute
23
Resolution (ADR) Multi-Option Program governed by ADR Local Rule 3. Counsel and clients
24
shall familiarize themselves with that rule and with the material entitled “Dispute Resolution
25
Procedures in the Northern District of California” on the Court ADR Internet site at
26
http://www.cand.uscourts.gov/adr. A limited number of printed copies are available from the
27
Clerk’s Office for parties in cases not subject to the court’s Electronic Case Filing program (ECF).
28
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff or removing defendant serve upon all parties
Case 3:19-cv-00872-EDL Document 5 Filed 02/19/19 Page 2 of 2
1
the brochure entitled “Consenting To A Magistrate Judge’s Jurisdiction In The Northern District
2
Of California", additional copies of which can be downloaded from the court’s Internet website:
3
http://www.cand.uscourts.gov.
4
CASE SCHEDULE – ADR MULTI-OPTION PROGRAM
5
6
Date
Event
7
2/18/2019
Complaint Filed
8
4/30/2019
*Last day to:
• meet and confer re: initial disclosures, early
settlement, ADR process selection, and discovery
plan
FRCivP 26(f) &
ADR L.R.3-5
• file ADR Certification signed by Parties and
Counsel (form available at
http://www.cand.uscourts.gov)
Civil L.R . 16-8(b)
& ADR L.R. 3-5(b)
**Last day to file Rule 26(f) Report, complete
initial disclosures or state objection in Rule 26(f)
Report and file Case Management Statement per
Standing Order re Contents of Joint Case
Management Statement
FRCivP 26(a) (1)
Civil L.R . 16-9
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
5/14/2019
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Governing Rule
(also available at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov)
5/21/2019
INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE (CMC) at 10:00 AM in:
Civil L.R . 16-10
Courtroom E, 15th Floor
Phillip Burton Federal Building
450 Golden Gate Avenue
San Francisco, CA 94102
21
22
* If the Initial Case Management Conference is continued, unless otherwise ordered this deadline is continued to 21
days in advance of the Initial Case Management Conference.
23
24
** If the Initial Case Management Conference is continued, unless otherwise ordered this deadline is continued to 7
days in advance of the Initial Case Management Conference.
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?