Diane Blackman et al v. Teespring, Inc et al

Filing 83

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 82 Dismissal with Prejudice. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 10/15/2020. (clS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/15/2020)

1
2
3
4

VICTOR JIH, State Bar No. 186515
WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
Professional Corporation
633 West Fifth Street, Ste. 1550
Los Angeles, CA 90071-2027
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

5
6
7
8
9
10

JAMIE Y. OTTO, State Bar No. 295099
WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
Professional Corporation
650 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

Stephen M. Doniger (SBN 179314)
[e-mail]
Scott Alan Burroughs (SBN 235718)
[e-mail]
Trevor W. Barrett (SBN 287174)
[e-mail]
Justin M. Gomes (SBN 301793)
[e-mail]
David R. Shein (SBN 230870)
[e-mail]
DONIGER / BURROUGHS
603 Rose Avenue
Venice, CA 90291
Telephone: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
DIANE BLACKMAN

Attorneys for Defendant
TEESPRING, INC.

11
12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

13

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

15
16

DIANE BLACKMAN,

17

Plaintiff,

18

v.

19

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE AND ORDER

TEESPRING, INC., et al.,

20

CASE NO.: 3:19-cv-01494-RS (SK)

Defendants.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE

Case No. 3:19-cv-01494-RS

1

Plaintiff Diane Blackman, by and through her attorneys of record, and Defendant

2

Teespring, Inc., by and through its attorneys of record, hereby notify the Court that the parties

3

have settled this matter. Consequently, pursuant to Rule 41 (a)(1)(A)(ii), the parties stipulate and

4

agree that the above-entitled action be dismissed with prejudice, with the Court maintaining

5

jurisdiction over the parties to this action in connection with the enforcement of the settlement

6

agreement between the parties, and with each party to bear its own costs and attorney fees and

7

that a judgment of dismissal with prejudice be entered in the above-captioned action pursuant to

8

this stipulation of dismissal with prejudice.

9
10

WHEREFORE the parties pray for an Order from the Court dismissing this action with
prejudice.

11
12

Dated: October 15, 2020

13
14

/s/ Jamie Y. Otto
Jamie Y. Otto
WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
Attorneys for Defendant
TEESPRING, INC.

15
16

Dated: October 15, 2020

17

/s/ David R. Shein
David R. Shein
DONIGER / BURROUGHS

18
Attorneys for Plaintiff
DIANE BLACKMAN

19
20
21
22

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

23
24
25

Dated: 10/15/2020

RICHARD SEEBORG
United States District Judge

26
27
28
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE

-1-

Case No. 3:19-cv-01494-RS