Bradbury v. Berryhill

Filing 22

ORDER granting 21 Stipulation as to 20 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment. Response due by 10/24/2019. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 10/10/2019. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/10/2019)

1
2
3
4

RICHARD ZIEMAN (CSB 230832)
1860 EL CAMINO REAL, STE 438
BURLINGAME, CA 94010
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorney for Plaintiff

5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10
11
12

GLENN D. BRADBURY
Plaintiff,

13

vs.

14

ANDREW SAUL,

15

Commissioner for Social Security

16

Defendant

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 3:19-cv-01667 WHO
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING
PLAINTIFF’S TIME TO FILE RESPONSE
TO DEFENDANT’S CROSS MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGEMENT.

17
18

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the undersigned attorneys, subject to the

19

approval of the Court, that Plaintiff may have an extension of 14 days in which to file Plaintiff’s

20

Response to Defendant’s Cross Motion for Summary Judgment, pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-1(e).

21

The response was due on Thursday, October 10, 2019. It is now due on Thursday, October 24,

22

2019.

23

//

24

//

25

//

26
27
28

1

DATED:

October 10, 2019

2

Richard Zieman /es/
RICHARD ZIEMAN
Attorney for Plaintiff

3
4
5
6

DATED:

October 10, 2019

7

Chantal Jenkins /es/
CHANTAL JENKINS
Specialist Assistant U.S. Attorney

8
9
10
11
12

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:

13
14
15
16
17

DATED: October 10, 2019

___________________
WILLIAM H. ORRICK
United States District Judge

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

P’s Stip/Order of ext to submit response, 3: 19-CV-01667 WHO Page 2