Facebook, Inc. et al v. Nollen et al

Filing 42

ORDER REGARDING INJUNCTION AND DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 10/08/2019. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/8/2019)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 550 South Hope Street, Suite 2000 Los Angeles, California 90071-2627 8 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 12 FACEBOOK, INC., a Delaware corporation and INSTAGRAM, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, 13 Plaintiffs, 14 15 16 17 18 CASE NO.: 3:19-CV-02262-WHO STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING INJUNCTION AND DISMISSAL v. AREND NOLLEN, LEON HEDGES, DAVID PASANEN, and SOCIAL MEDIA SERIES LIMITED, Defendants. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3:19-CV-02262-WHO STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING INJUNCTION AND DISMISSAL 1 WHEREAS, on April 25, 2019, Plaintiffs Facebook, Inc. and Instagram, LLC (together, 2 “Plaintiffs”) filed this action against Arend Nollen, Leon Hedges, David Pasanen and Social Media 3 Series Limited (together, “Defendants”) asserting claims for breach of contract, violations of the 4 Comprehensive Computer Data Access and Fraud Act and the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, and 5 unjust enrichment; 6 7 8 9 WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to resolve this action, and part of that resolution includes the entry of a stipulated injunction; WHEREAS, Defendants have denied that they are subject to personal jurisdiction in this Court, but have agreed to submit to the personal jurisdiction of this Court solely for purposes of the Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP 550 South Hope Street, Suite 2000 Los Angeles, California 90071-2627 10 entry and enforcement of this Stipulated Injunction and the parties’ settlement agreement without 11 waiving their rights to contest personal jurisdiction, or to argue forum non conveniens, in any other 12 proceeding. 13 NOW, THEREFORE, Plaintiffs and Defendants stipulate and agree as follows: 14 15 16 17 STIPULATED INJUNCTION IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED, pursuant to stipulation of the Parties, that: 1. Defendants shall notify all their current and future employees and agents of the 18 existence of this Injunction and provide a copy of this Injunction to all current and future employees 19 and agents. 20 Defendants and all individuals acting on Defendants’ behalf who are described in 2. 21 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2) (collectively, the “Prohibited Parties”) are immediately and 22 permanently ordered and enjoined from accessing and using Facebook and Instagram as follows: 23 a. Each Defendant is immediately and permanently enjoined from creating or 24 maintaining, or having a third party create or maintain, a Facebook or Instagram account for that 25 Defendant. 26 b. In addition, each Prohibited Party, including any entity directly or indirectly 27 controlled by that Prohibited Party, is immediately and permanently enjoined from logging into, 28 managing, manipulating, operating, or otherwise taking action on behalf of, any Facebook or 1 3:19-CV-02262-WHO STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING INJUNCTION AND DISMISSAL 1 Instagram account of any Facebook or Instagram user other than that Prohibited Party, whether 2 directly or indirectly via a third party, intermediary, or proxy; nor shall any Prohibited Party, nor any 3 entity directly or indirectly controlled by that Prohibited Party cause or allow any third party to do so 4 on such person’s behalf. 5 c. In addition, the Prohibited Parties are immediately and permanently prohibited 6 from engaging in any business (whether in their own capacity, as employees, or as persons who 7 control another entity) to deliver “likes,” “views,” or “followers” to individual Instagram users, at 8 the users’ request and in exchange for payment by the users (the “Instagram Engagement Business”), 9 whether directly or indirectly via a third party, intermediary, or proxy. Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP 550 South Hope Street, Suite 2000 Los Angeles, California 90071-2627 10 d. In addition, within ten (10) days of the entry of this Order, the Prohibited 11 Parties shall permanently remove all references to their Instagram Engagement Business from any 12 and all websites, including but not limited to the websites listed in Schedule VII of the parties’ 13 settlement agreement, that they own or have the ability to control; 14 e. In addition, within ten (10) days of the entry of this Order, the Prohibited 15 Parties shall undertake reasonable efforts to permanently remove all advertisements or postings on 16 external websites advertising or describing their Instagram Engagement Business, whether such 17 advertisements or postings were created or posted directly or indirectly via a third party, 18 intermediary, or proxy; 19 f. In addition, within ten (10) days of the entry of this Order, the Prohibited 20 Parties shall cease operating any website that Defendants previously used to offer Instagram 21 Engagement Business services. 22 3. The Court will retain continuing jurisdiction to enforce the terms of this Stipulated 23 Injunction and to address any other matters arising out of or regarding this Stipulated Injunction, 24 including any allegations that the Parties have failed to comply with their obligations as set forth in 25 this Stipulated Injunction, and the Parties agree to submit to the Court’s jurisdiction for such 26 purposes. The Court notes that Defendants have not waived their rights to contest personal 27 jurisdiction, or to argue forum non conveniens, on other issues and in any other proceeding that does 28 not relate to the enforcement of this Stipulated Injunction or the parties’ settlement agreement. 2 3:19-CV-02262-WHO STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING INJUNCTION AND DISMISSAL 1 2 4. The rights and obligations under this Stipulated Injunction shall benefit, and be binding upon, each of Parties and their respective affiliates, predecessors, successors and assigns. 3 4 DISMISSAL 5. Plaintiffs’ claims against Defendants are hereby dismissed with prejudice against all 5 Defendants, except the Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce this Stipulated Injunction and 6 Dismissal. Each Party shall bear its own fees and costs. 7 8 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 9 Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP 550 South Hope Street, Suite 2000 Los Angeles, California 90071-2627 10 Respectfully submitted, Dated: September ___, 2019 HUNTON ANDREWS KURTH LLP 11 12 By: Ann Marie Mortimer Jason J. Kim Attorneys for Plaintiffs FACEBOOK, INC. and INSTAGRAM, LLC 13 14 15 16 Respectfully submitted, 17 18 Dated: September ___, 2019 THE NORTON LAW FIRM PC 19 By: 20 Fred Norton Bree Hann Matt Turetzky Tyler M. Layton Attorneys for Defendants AREND NOLLEN, LEON HEDGES, DAVID PASANEN, and SOCIAL MEDIA SERIES LIMITED 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 3:19-CV-02262-WHO STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING INJUNCTION AND DISMISSAL 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. Court retains jurisdiction. 2 3 DATED: October 8, 2019 WILLIAM H. ORRICK United States District Judge 4 5 6 7 8 9 Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP 550 South Hope Street, Suite 2000 Los Angeles, California 90071-2627 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 3:19-CV-02262-WHO STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING INJUNCTION AND DISMISSAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?