Facebook, Inc. et al v. Nollen et al
Filing
42
ORDER REGARDING INJUNCTION AND DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 10/08/2019. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/8/2019)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
550 South Hope Street, Suite 2000
Los Angeles, California 90071-2627
8
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
12
FACEBOOK, INC., a Delaware corporation
and INSTAGRAM, LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company,
13
Plaintiffs,
14
15
16
17
18
CASE NO.: 3:19-CV-02262-WHO
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER REGARDING INJUNCTION AND
DISMISSAL
v.
AREND NOLLEN, LEON HEDGES,
DAVID PASANEN, and SOCIAL MEDIA
SERIES LIMITED,
Defendants.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3:19-CV-02262-WHO
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING INJUNCTION AND DISMISSAL
1
WHEREAS, on April 25, 2019, Plaintiffs Facebook, Inc. and Instagram, LLC (together,
2
“Plaintiffs”) filed this action against Arend Nollen, Leon Hedges, David Pasanen and Social Media
3
Series Limited (together, “Defendants”) asserting claims for breach of contract, violations of the
4
Comprehensive Computer Data Access and Fraud Act and the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, and
5
unjust enrichment;
6
7
8
9
WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to resolve this action, and part of that resolution
includes the entry of a stipulated injunction;
WHEREAS, Defendants have denied that they are subject to personal jurisdiction in this
Court, but have agreed to submit to the personal jurisdiction of this Court solely for purposes of the
Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
550 South Hope Street, Suite 2000
Los Angeles, California 90071-2627
10
entry and enforcement of this Stipulated Injunction and the parties’ settlement agreement without
11
waiving their rights to contest personal jurisdiction, or to argue forum non conveniens, in any other
12
proceeding.
13
NOW, THEREFORE, Plaintiffs and Defendants stipulate and agree as follows:
14
15
16
17
STIPULATED INJUNCTION
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED, pursuant to stipulation of the
Parties, that:
1.
Defendants shall notify all their current and future employees and agents of the
18
existence of this Injunction and provide a copy of this Injunction to all current and future employees
19
and agents.
20
Defendants and all individuals acting on Defendants’ behalf who are described in
2.
21
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2) (collectively, the “Prohibited Parties”) are immediately and
22
permanently ordered and enjoined from accessing and using Facebook and Instagram as follows:
23
a.
Each Defendant is immediately and permanently enjoined from creating or
24
maintaining, or having a third party create or maintain, a Facebook or Instagram account for that
25
Defendant.
26
b.
In addition, each Prohibited Party, including any entity directly or indirectly
27
controlled by that Prohibited Party, is immediately and permanently enjoined from logging into,
28
managing, manipulating, operating, or otherwise taking action on behalf of, any Facebook or
1
3:19-CV-02262-WHO
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING INJUNCTION AND DISMISSAL
1
Instagram account of any Facebook or Instagram user other than that Prohibited Party, whether
2
directly or indirectly via a third party, intermediary, or proxy; nor shall any Prohibited Party, nor any
3
entity directly or indirectly controlled by that Prohibited Party cause or allow any third party to do so
4
on such person’s behalf.
5
c.
In addition, the Prohibited Parties are immediately and permanently prohibited
6
from engaging in any business (whether in their own capacity, as employees, or as persons who
7
control another entity) to deliver “likes,” “views,” or “followers” to individual Instagram users, at
8
the users’ request and in exchange for payment by the users (the “Instagram Engagement Business”),
9
whether directly or indirectly via a third party, intermediary, or proxy.
Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
550 South Hope Street, Suite 2000
Los Angeles, California 90071-2627
10
d.
In addition, within ten (10) days of the entry of this Order, the Prohibited
11
Parties shall permanently remove all references to their Instagram Engagement Business from any
12
and all websites, including but not limited to the websites listed in Schedule VII of the parties’
13
settlement agreement, that they own or have the ability to control;
14
e.
In addition, within ten (10) days of the entry of this Order, the Prohibited
15
Parties shall undertake reasonable efforts to permanently remove all advertisements or postings on
16
external websites advertising or describing their Instagram Engagement Business, whether such
17
advertisements or postings were created or posted directly or indirectly via a third party,
18
intermediary, or proxy;
19
f.
In addition, within ten (10) days of the entry of this Order, the Prohibited
20
Parties shall cease operating any website that Defendants previously used to offer Instagram
21
Engagement Business services.
22
3.
The Court will retain continuing jurisdiction to enforce the terms of this Stipulated
23
Injunction and to address any other matters arising out of or regarding this Stipulated Injunction,
24
including any allegations that the Parties have failed to comply with their obligations as set forth in
25
this Stipulated Injunction, and the Parties agree to submit to the Court’s jurisdiction for such
26
purposes. The Court notes that Defendants have not waived their rights to contest personal
27
jurisdiction, or to argue forum non conveniens, on other issues and in any other proceeding that does
28
not relate to the enforcement of this Stipulated Injunction or the parties’ settlement agreement.
2
3:19-CV-02262-WHO
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING INJUNCTION AND DISMISSAL
1
2
4.
The rights and obligations under this Stipulated Injunction shall benefit, and be
binding upon, each of Parties and their respective affiliates, predecessors, successors and assigns.
3
4
DISMISSAL
5.
Plaintiffs’ claims against Defendants are hereby dismissed with prejudice against all
5
Defendants, except the Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce this Stipulated Injunction and
6
Dismissal. Each Party shall bear its own fees and costs.
7
8
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
9
Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
550 South Hope Street, Suite 2000
Los Angeles, California 90071-2627
10
Respectfully submitted,
Dated: September ___, 2019
HUNTON ANDREWS KURTH LLP
11
12
By:
Ann Marie Mortimer
Jason J. Kim
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
FACEBOOK, INC. and INSTAGRAM,
LLC
13
14
15
16
Respectfully submitted,
17
18
Dated: September ___, 2019
THE NORTON LAW FIRM PC
19
By:
20
Fred Norton
Bree Hann
Matt Turetzky
Tyler M. Layton
Attorneys for Defendants
AREND NOLLEN, LEON HEDGES,
DAVID PASANEN, and SOCIAL MEDIA
SERIES LIMITED
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
3:19-CV-02262-WHO
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING INJUNCTION AND DISMISSAL
1
IT IS SO ORDERED. Court retains jurisdiction.
2
3
DATED: October 8, 2019
WILLIAM H. ORRICK
United States District Judge
4
5
6
7
8
9
Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
550 South Hope Street, Suite 2000
Los Angeles, California 90071-2627
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
3:19-CV-02262-WHO
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING INJUNCTION AND DISMISSAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?