In re HIV Antitrust Litigation
Filing
1966
ORDER re #1961 Trial Witness Disclosures. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/13/2023. (emclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/13/2023)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
IN RE HIV ANTITRUST LITIGATION.
Case No. 19-cv-02573-EMC
8
ORDER RE TRIAL WITNESS
DISCLOSURES
9
10
Docket No. 1961
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
This order memorializes the Court’s June 13, 2023, ruling with respect to an exhibit that
14
15
Defendants intend to use on cross-examination of Dr. McGuire: Exhibit No. 8124. The exhibit is
16
a report written by the Bureau of Competition which is a division within the Federal Trade
17
Commission. The report provides an overview of pharmaceutical patent settlement agreements
18
filed with the Federal Trade Commission in 2017 under the Medicare Prescription Drug,
19
Improvement and Modernization Act.
During a conference held outside the presence of the jury, Defendants clarified that they
20
21
would not seek to admit the exhibit but did intend to elicit testimony from him based on his
22
consideration of the document in preparing his report(s). The Court shall allow Defendants to use
23
the exhibit in examination of the witness; however, it is not to be admitted or published to the jury,
24
and Defendants is only permitted to refer to the exhibit as a document coming from a public
25
source, and not the Federal Trade Commission specifically. This approach is
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
consistent with the Court’s earlier rulings in which it held that there are 403 problems with either
2
side referring to Federal Trade Commission approval or disapproval of patent settlement
3
agreements.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
Dated: June 13, 2023
8
9
10
______________________________________
EDWARD M. CHEN
United States District Judge
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?