Dolby Laboratories, Inc. v. Intertrust Technologies Corporation

Filing 58

ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen re 31 , 40 , and 44 Administrative Motions to File Under Seal. (emclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2019)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

DOLBY LABORATORIES, INC.,
Plaintiff,

8

11

ORDER RE MOTIONS TO FILE
UNDER SEAL

v.

9
10

Case No. 19-cv-03371-EMC

INTERTRUST TECHNOLOGIES
CORPORATION,

Docket Nos. 31, 40, 44, 57

United States District Court
Northern District of California

Defendant.
12
13
14
15

The Court has reviewed the parties’ joint report regarding sealing. See Docket No. 57.
Based on that report, the Court hereby orders as follows.
(1)

The motion to seal at Docket No. 31 is denied as moot. The parties have agreed

16

that sealing is not necessary. Dolby is ordered to publicly file all documents (or

17

portions thereof) that were subject to that motion.

18

(2)

The motion to seal at Docket No. 40 is denied as moot. The parties have agreed

19

that sealing is not necessary. Intertrust is ordered to publicly file all documents (or

20

portions thereof) that were subject to that motion.

21

(3)

The motion to seal at Docket No. 44 is granted in part and denied in part. The

22

parties have agreed that sealing is not necessary with respect to the reply brief;

23

therefore, to that extent, the motion to seal is denied as moot, and Intertrust is

24

ordered to publicly file its reply brief. Intertrust, however, has still asked that

25

Exhibit 1 to the Kaericher Reply Declaration be filed under seal. Dolby does not

26

oppose. Given the parties’ agreement, and the fact that the specifics of the

27

document were not material to the Court’s order, the Court is willing to seal at this

28

time but reserves the right to right to revisit the issue, if necessary. This ruling

1

does not mean that any infringement analysis by either party moving forward is

2

necessarily subject to sealing.

3

(4)

receipt of this order.

4
5

Where a party is ordered to make a public filing, it shall do so promptly upon

(5)

Finally, the parties have agreed that no portion of the Court’s order of November 6,

6

2019, need be sealed. Accordingly, the Court shall publicly file the order

7

forthwith.

8

This order disposes of Docket Nos. 31, 40, and 44.

9
10

IT IS SO ORDERED.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12

Dated: November 13, 2019

13
14
15

______________________________________
EDWARD M. CHEN
United States District Judge

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2