East Bay Sanctuary Covenant et al v. Barr et al

Filing 59

SCHEDULING ORDER. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on August 19, 2019. (mllS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/19/2019)

Download PDF
Case 3:19-cv-04073-JST Document 59 Filed 08/19/19 Page 1 of 1 1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 EAST BAY SANCTUARY COVENANT, et al., 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 19-cv-04073-JST SCHEDULING ORDER Re: ECF No. 57 WILLIAM BARR, et al., Defendants. 12 13 The Court has received Plaintiffs’ Emergency Motion to Consider Supplemental Evidence 14 and Restore the Nationwide Scope of the Injunction. ECF No. 57. Regarding the scheduling of 15 the motion, the Court believes that the neither 48 hours proposed by the Plaintiffs for Defendants 16 to respond, id. at 3, nor the “months” proposed by the Defendants, id. at 4, seems reasonable. 17 Also, the Court requires more legal briefing from the Plaintiffs than is contained in their 18 Emergency Motion on the legal framework for the issuance of a nationwide injunction, so that 19 both parties can thoroughly address this issue. The Court will therefore invite the Plaintiffs to file 20 an amended brief in support of their motion. 21 Accordingly, the Court now sets the following schedule: Plaintiffs’ amended opening brief 22 is due August 22, 2019; Defendants’ opposition is due August 29, 2019; and Plaintiffs’ reply is 23 due September 3, 2019. The Court will conduct a hearing on September 5, 2019 at 9:30 a.m. 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 19, 2019 ______________________________________ JON S. TIGAR United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?