Wood v. County of Contra Costa et al

Filing 56

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 10, 2019. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/10/2019)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ANDREA WOOD, Plaintiff, 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 Case No. 19-cv-04266-MMC ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS v. COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 53 Defendants. 12 13 The Court is in receipt of plaintiff Andrea Wood's "Motion for Sanctions," filed 14 October 7, 2019, by which she seeks, pursuant to Rule 11(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil 15 Procedure, an order of sanctions against counsel of record for the County Defendants in 16 the above-titled action. 17 The Court having fully considered the matter, the motion is hereby DENIED, 18 plaintiff having failed to show she served the motion at least 21 days before she filed it 19 (see Pl.'s Rule 11(c)(2) Certificate); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(c)(2), and, more 20 importantly, plaintiff having failed to show a violation of Rule 11. 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: October 10, 2019 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?