Facebook, Inc. et al v. OnLineNic Inc et al

Filing 329

ORDER RE: -MOTION TO STRIKE; -35.CN'S SUR-REPLY; AND -HEARING DATE (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 6/6/2023)

Download PDF
Case 3:19-cv-07071-SI Document 329 Filed 06/06/23 Page 1 of 1 1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 FACEBOOK, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 Case No. 19-cv-07071-SI v. ONLINENIC INC, et al., ORDER RE: -MOTION TO STRIKE; -35.CN’S SUR-REPLY; -HEARING DATE Defendants. 12 13 Now pending before the Court is plaintiffs’ motion to strike defendant’s answer and for entry 14 of default against defendant Xiamen 35.com Internet Technology Co., Ltd (“35.CN”). Dkt. No. 15 299. In its opposition brief, 35.CN argues inter alia that plaintiffs’ motion to strike should more 16 properly have been brought as a motion for summary judgment. See Opp’n at 2, 11-12. 35.CN has 17 also filed an objection to plaintiffs’ reply evidence, requesting that 35.CN be granted leave to file a 18 sur-reply. See Dkt. No. 327. 19 Having reviewed the briefs as well as the voluminous records the parties have submitted, the 20 Court hereby NOTIFIES the parties of its intent to treat plaintiffs’ motion to strike as one for 21 summary judgment. The Court GRANTS 35.CN leave to file a sur-reply, not to exceed 10 pages in 22 length. 35.CN shall file its sur-reply no later than June 23, 2023. 23 24 25 26 27 28 The Court CONTINUES the hearing from June 16 to July 14, 2023, at 10:00 a.m., to be held over Zoom videoconference. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 6, 2023 ______________________________________ SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?