Rocha v. City of Antioch et al

Filing 156

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL IN EXCHANGE FOR WAIVER OF COSTS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on June 3, 2021. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/3/2021)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

KEVIN P. ALLEN, State Bar No. 252290
[e-mail]
JOHN B. ROBINSON, State Bar No. 297065
[e-mail]
ALLEN, GLAESSNER, HAZELWOOD & WERTH, LLP
180 Montgomery Street, Suite 1200
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Attorneys for Defendants
CITY OF ANTIOCH, SGT. MATTHEW KOCH, OFC.
ZECHARIAH MATIS and OFC. KRISTOPHER KINT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
180 Montgomery Street, Suite 1200
San Francisco, California 94104

ALLEN, GLAESSNER, HAZELWOOD & WERTH, LLP

8

11

CAMERON ROCHA,
Plaintiff,

12
13
14

v.

Case No.: 3:19-cv-07312-MMC
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL IN
EXCHANGE FOR WAIVER OF COSTS;
[PROPOSED] ORDER

CITY OF ANTIOCH, et al.,
Defendants.

15
16
17
18

TO THE COURT

19

On April 29, 2021, the jury returned a verdict in favor of City of Antioch and Ofc.

20

Zechariah Matis on all causes of action before them. (Dkt. No. 140). Defendants Sgt. Koch and

21

Ofc. Kint were previously dismissed from the case on April 22, 2021 (Dkt. No. 132, 3). The

22

Court entered judgment for Defendants on April 29, 2021. (Dkt. No. 146). Pursuant to Fed. R.

23

Civ. P. 54(d)(1) and 28 U.S.C. §1920, Defendants submitted a cost bill on May 13, 2021, in the

24

amount of $17,046.30 (Dkt. No. 152).

25
26
27
28

The jury returned a verdict on plaintiff Cameron Rocha’s California state-law claims. His
federal claims on currently on appeal (Dkt. No. 52, 56).
The parties have met-and-conferred and, by and through their respective counsel, hereby
stipulate as follows:
1

STIP. FOR DISMISSAL
3:19-CV-07312-MMC

1

1. Plaintiff Cameron Rocha (“Plaintiff”) waives any and all post-trial motions in the

2

above-captioned case;

3

2. Plaintiff waives any appeal in the above-captioned case;

4

3. Plaintiff dismisses, with prejudice, any and all remaining claims in the above-

5

captioned case, including but not limited to: Fourth Amendment Excessive Force

6

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Supervisory Liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983; and
4. Defendants withdraw their pending Cost Bill.

8

Execution of this stipulation and its approval by the Court will render moot Defendants’

9

current appeal in the Ninth Circuit (Case No. 21-15456). Upon Court approval of this stipulation,

10
180 Montgomery Street, Suite 1200
San Francisco, California 94104

ALLEN, GLAESSNER, HAZELWOOD & WERTH, LLP

7

Defendants will file a copy of the same with the Ninth Circuit and dismiss said appeal (each side

11

to bears its fees and costs relating to the appeal, including attorneys’ fees).

12
13
14

Respectfully Submitted,
Dated: June 3, 2021

SIEGEL & YEE

15
By:

16
17
18

/s/ Chan Kim
DANIEL SIEGEL
CHAN A. KIM
EMILYROSE JOHNS
Attorneys for Plaintiff
CAMERON ROCHA

19
20

Dated: June 3, 2021

ALLEN, GLAESSNER,
HAZELWOOD & WERTH, LLP

21
By:

22
23
24
25
26

///

27

///

28

/s/ Kevin P. Allen
KEVIN P. ALLEN
JOHN B. ROBINSON
Attorneys for Defendants
CITY OF ANTIOCH, SGT. MATTHEW
KOCH, OFC. ZECHARIAH MATIS and OFC.
KRISTOPHER KINT

///
2

STIP. FOR DISMISSAL
3:19-CV-07312-MMC

1

PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION SET FORTH ABOVE, IT IS SO ORDERED.

2
3
4
5

June 3, 2021
DATED: ________________________ _____________________________________
_______________________________
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge

6
7

9
10
180 Montgomery Street, Suite 1200
San Francisco, California 94104

ALLEN, GLAESSNER, HAZELWOOD & WERTH, LLP

8

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3

STIP. FOR DISMISSAL
3:19-CV-07312-MMC