Jaime et al v. County of Alameda et al
Filing
48
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 47 DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION, WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 1/6/2021. (clS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/6/2021)
1
2
3
4
5
NOAH G. BLECHMAN (State Bar No. 197167)
noah.blechman@mcnamaralaw.com
RANDOLPH S. HOM (State Bar No. 152833)
randolph.hom@mcnamaralaw.com
MCNAMARA, NEY, BEATTY, SLATTERY,
BORGES & AMBACHER LLP
3480 Buskirk Avenue, Suite 250
Pleasant Hill, CA 94523
Telephone: (925) 939-5330
Facsimile: (925) 939-0203
6
Attorneys for Defendant
County of Alameda
8
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
3480 BUSKIRK AVENUE, SUITE 250, PLEASANT HILL, CA 94523
TELEPHONE: (925) 939-5330
McNAMARA, NEY, BEATTY, SLATTERY, BORGES & AMBACHER LLP
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
JOSE JAIME, an individual, GABRIELA
COVARRUBIAS, individually and as cosuccessor-in-interest to Decedent
CHRISTIAN MADRIGAL,
14
15
16
17
18
19
Case No. C19-08367 RS
STIPULATION AND ORDER
DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION, WITH
PREJUDICE
Plaintiffs,
vs.
COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, a municipal
corporation; CRAIG CEDERGREN, in his
individual and official capacity as a law
enforcement officer for the Alameda
County Sheriff’s Dept.; JOSE
MADRIGAL, as co-successor-in-interest to
Dec. MADRIGAL; and DOES 1-50,
inclusive,,
20
Defendants.
21
22
The relevant parties, by and through their respective attorneys of record, hereby stipulate
23
and jointly request an Order from the Court to a dismissal of the Plaintiffs Complaint (ECF 1), the
24
entire action, against all Defendants, with prejudice. Each party agrees to bear its own fees and
25
costs as to this dismissal.
26
27
The parties attest that concurrence in the filing of these documents has been obtained from
each of the other Signatories, which shall serve in lieu of their signatures on the document.
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER
DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION, WITH
PREJUDICE - C19-08367 RS
1
2
IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.
Dated: January 6, 2021
POINTER & BUELNA, LLP
3
/s/ Buelna, Patrick
PATRICK M. BUELNA
COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFFS
4
5
6
Dated: January 6, 2021
MCNAMARA, NEY, BEATTY, SLATTERY,
BORGES & AMBACHER LLP
8
By:
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
3480 BUSKIRK AVENUE, SUITE 250, PLEASANT HILL, CA 94523
TELEPHONE: (925) 939-5330
McNAMARA, NEY, BEATTY, SLATTERY, BORGES & AMBACHER LLP
7
9
10
/s/ Blechman, Noah G.
Noah G. Blechman
Randolph S. Hom
Attorneys for Defendant
County of Alameda
11
Dated: January 6, 2021
LAW OFFICES OF MATTHEW M. GRIGG
12
By:
13
14
/s/ Grigg, Matthew M.
Matthew M. Grigg
Attorney for Defendant
CRAIG CEDERGREN
15
16
17
18
19
20
ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION AND REQUEST, IT IS ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:
The Court hereby dismisses this entire action, with prejudice, as to all claims alleged by
Plaintiffs. Each party to bear its own fees and costs as to this dismissal. All further dates and
deadline set in this matter are vacated.
IT IS SO ORDERED
21
22
January 6, 2021
DATED:___________________
23
By:______________________________
Hon. Richard Seeborg
U.S. District Judge
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER
DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION, WITH
PREJUDICE - C19-08367 RS
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?