Jaime et al v. County of Alameda et al

Filing 48

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 47 DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION, WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 1/6/2021. (clS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/6/2021)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 NOAH G. BLECHMAN (State Bar No. 197167) noah.blechman@mcnamaralaw.com RANDOLPH S. HOM (State Bar No. 152833) randolph.hom@mcnamaralaw.com MCNAMARA, NEY, BEATTY, SLATTERY, BORGES & AMBACHER LLP 3480 Buskirk Avenue, Suite 250 Pleasant Hill, CA 94523 Telephone: (925) 939-5330 Facsimile: (925) 939-0203 6 Attorneys for Defendant County of Alameda 8 ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3480 BUSKIRK AVENUE, SUITE 250, PLEASANT HILL, CA 94523 TELEPHONE: (925) 939-5330 McNAMARA, NEY, BEATTY, SLATTERY, BORGES & AMBACHER LLP 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 JOSE JAIME, an individual, GABRIELA COVARRUBIAS, individually and as cosuccessor-in-interest to Decedent CHRISTIAN MADRIGAL, 14 15 16 17 18 19 Case No. C19-08367 RS STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION, WITH PREJUDICE Plaintiffs, vs. COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, a municipal corporation; CRAIG CEDERGREN, in his individual and official capacity as a law enforcement officer for the Alameda County Sheriff’s Dept.; JOSE MADRIGAL, as co-successor-in-interest to Dec. MADRIGAL; and DOES 1-50, inclusive,, 20 Defendants. 21 22 The relevant parties, by and through their respective attorneys of record, hereby stipulate 23 and jointly request an Order from the Court to a dismissal of the Plaintiffs Complaint (ECF 1), the 24 entire action, against all Defendants, with prejudice. Each party agrees to bear its own fees and 25 costs as to this dismissal. 26 27 The parties attest that concurrence in the filing of these documents has been obtained from each of the other Signatories, which shall serve in lieu of their signatures on the document. 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION, WITH PREJUDICE - C19-08367 RS 1 2 IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. Dated: January 6, 2021 POINTER & BUELNA, LLP 3 /s/ Buelna, Patrick PATRICK M. BUELNA COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFFS 4 5 6 Dated: January 6, 2021 MCNAMARA, NEY, BEATTY, SLATTERY, BORGES & AMBACHER LLP 8 By: ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3480 BUSKIRK AVENUE, SUITE 250, PLEASANT HILL, CA 94523 TELEPHONE: (925) 939-5330 McNAMARA, NEY, BEATTY, SLATTERY, BORGES & AMBACHER LLP 7 9 10 /s/ Blechman, Noah G. Noah G. Blechman Randolph S. Hom Attorneys for Defendant County of Alameda 11 Dated: January 6, 2021 LAW OFFICES OF MATTHEW M. GRIGG 12 By: 13 14 /s/ Grigg, Matthew M. Matthew M. Grigg Attorney for Defendant CRAIG CEDERGREN 15 16 17 18 19 20 ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION AND REQUEST, IT IS ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: The Court hereby dismisses this entire action, with prejudice, as to all claims alleged by Plaintiffs. Each party to bear its own fees and costs as to this dismissal. All further dates and deadline set in this matter are vacated. IT IS SO ORDERED 21 22 January 6, 2021 DATED:___________________ 23 By:______________________________ Hon. Richard Seeborg U.S. District Judge 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION, WITH PREJUDICE - C19-08367 RS 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?