Doshier et al v. Facebook Inc
Filing
112
ORDER Granting 110 Stipulated Remote Video Deposition Protocol Signed by Judge William Alsup. (whalc5, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2021)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
SOLOMON B. CERA (Bar No. 099467)
THOMAS C. BRIGHT (Bar No. 169713)
CERA LLP
595 Market St. Suite 1350
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: +1 (415) 777-2230
Fax: +1 (415) 777-5189
Email: scera@cerallp.com
Email: tbright@cerallp.com
DAVID A. HODGES
(Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
THE DAVID HODGES LAW FIRM
Centre Place
212 Center Street, Fifth Floor
Little Rock, AR 72201-2429
Telephone: +1 (501) 374-2400
Email: david@hodgeslaw.com
ASHLEY M. SIMONSEN (Bar No. 275203)
COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
1999 Avenue of the Stars
Los Angeles, CA 90067-4643
Telephone: +1 (424) 332-4782
Fax: +1 (424) 332-4749
Email: asimonsen@cov.com
SIMON J. FRANKEL (Bar No. 171552)
SEAN F. HOWELL (Bar No. 315967)
COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
Salesforce Tower
415 Mission Street, Suite 5400
San Francisco, CA 94105-2533
Telephone: + 1 (415) 591-6000
Fax: + 1 (415) 591-6091
Email: sfrankel@cov.com
Email: showell@cov.com
14
KATHRYN E. CAHOY (Bar No. 298777)
COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
3000 El Camino Real
5 Palo Alto Square, 10th Floor
Palo Alto, CA 94306-2112
Telephone: + 1 (650) 632-4700
Fax: + 1 (650) 632-4800
Email: kcahoy@cov.com
15
Attorneys for Defendant Facebook, Inc.
11
Attorneys for Plaintiff and the Proposed Class
12
13
16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
DOTSTRATEGY, CO., Individually and
On Behalf of All Others Similarly
Situated,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 3:20-CV-00170-WHA
STIPULATED REMOTE VIDEO
DEPOSITION PROTOCOL AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Hon. William Alsup
FACEBOOK, INC.,
Defendant.
26
27
28
STIPULATED REMOTE VIDEO DEPOSITION PROTOCOL
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No.: 3:20-cv-00170-WHA
Through their respective counsel, Plaintiff dotStrategy, Co. and Defendant Facebook, Inc.
1
2
(together, the “Parties”) hereby agree to the following protocol for conducting depositions
3
remotely using videoconference technology in the pending litigation captioned dotStrategy, Co.
4
v. Facebook, Inc., Case No. 3:20-cv-00170-WHA (N.D. Cal.). This agreement is not intended
5
to act as a waiver of any party’s rights or protections, nor is it intended to act as a waiver of the
6
applicable procedures under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Nothing in this protocol in
7
any way modifies the Protective Order in effect in this case, with which the parties must comply.
8
A.
9
Prior to the Deposition
1.
At least two business days prior to the scheduled deposition, counsel taking the
10
deposition will advise opposing counsel of the remote deposition vendor assisting in
11
taking the deposition along with contact information for such vendor.
12
2.
At least five calendar days prior to the scheduled deposition, counsel taking the
13
deposition will advise opposing counsel of the method counsel intends to use to
14
display or provide documents to the witness during the deposition.
15
3.
Any party who wishes the deponent to use hard copies of documents as exhibits
16
during the deposition is responsible for ensuring that copies of those documents are
17
received by the deponent one business day prior to the deposition. The party
18
representing the deponent shall provide the correct address for such delivery by
19
FedEx, UPS, or other delivery service no later than three business days prior to the
20
deposition. All documents provided in hard copy to a deponent shall simultaneously
21
be transmitted to all counsel and the court reporter designated to attend that
22
deposition by hard copy (for arrival one business day prior to the deposition. Hard
23
copy documents may be sealed in envelopes or other packaging for opening on
24
camera during the deposition by the witness and all counsel.
25
4.
Any party who wishes the deponent to use electronic copies of documents as exhibits
26
during the deposition (pursuant to the procedures set forth in Subsection B.14) need
27
not share copies in advance of the deposition.
28
1
STIPULATED REMOTE VIDEO DEPOSITION PROTOCOL
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No.: 3:20-cv-00170-WHA
1
2
B.
During the Deposition
1.
The deposition must be conducted by secure audio and video conferencing
3
technology that requires secure access by each participant. The deposition shall not
4
commence until each deposition attendee, including all lead counsel, has announced
5
his or herself and has joined the electronic “room” in which the deposition will take
6
place and audio and video are functioning properly.
7
2.
The deponent must appear on video with his or her face visible throughout the
8
deposition, except during breaks on the record. Lead counsel for each party must
9
also appear on video throughout questioning with their faces visible; other attendees
10
for each party must be clearly announced before questioning begins, but may appear
11
by audio only (unless they are in the same room as deponent, in which case they must
12
comply with Subsection B.3 below).
13
3.
If counsel who is representing the deponent is in the same room as deponent, counsel
14
must clearly announce that they are present in the room with the deponent on the
15
record, before questioning begins, as must any other attendee in the room with
16
deponent. Any attendee in the same room with the deponent must appear on video
17
with faces visible throughout questioning. If, during questioning, anyone (whether
18
an attendee or otherwise) enters the same room as deponent, the deponent must
19
promptly notify the deposition attendees on the record that someone has entered the
20
room, identify the person, and announce when that person exits the room.
21
4.
The court reporter will administer the oath to the deponent remotely by means of the
22
video and audio connection. The oath may be administered from outside the
23
jurisdiction of the witness.
24
5.
may record the deposition by video or audio means.
25
26
27
No one other than the remote deposition vendor, court reporter, and/or videographer
6.
To ensure optimal audio quality and minimize the risk of disruption, all attorneys or
other attendees who are not questioning the deponent or lodging an objection shall
28
2
STIPULATED REMOTE VIDEO DEPOSITION PROTOCOL
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No.: 3:20-cv-00170-WHA
1
mute their microphones unless and until they are required to speak or lodge an
2
objection.
3
7.
Each party has the right to be present on video and to have clear audio input and
4
output. Once the deposition begins, if a lead counsel becomes disconnected from the
5
deposition, either by audio, video, or both, that fact shall be noted on the record as
6
soon as the parties become aware of that issue and the deposition must immediately
7
be suspended until that attorney has re-joined and has full access to both audio and
8
video. The suspended time will not count against the time limitations in the Federal
9
Rules of Civil Procedure.
10
8.
The court reporter and videographer will provide a telephone number for use by the
11
attendees to inform the court reporter or videographer if a lead counsel becomes
12
disconnected or is otherwise experiencing technical difficulties.
13
9.
Any portion of the deposition that has been transcribed while a lead counsel is absent
14
or experiencing technical difficulties must be re-read by the court reporter or
15
videographer upon the resolution of the technical difficulty and that attorney must be
16
given an opportunity to object to any questions or answers that occurred in his or her
17
absence.
18
10. During the conduct of the deposition, to avoid the difficulties posed by simultaneous
19
speaking over an internet video and audio connection, counsel and the deponent will
20
not interrupt each other and will strive to allow a pause between the conclusion of
21
one person speaking and another person speaking.
22
11. If at any time the court reporter indicates that he or she is unable to effectively
23
transcribe the deposition due to technical difficulties, the deposition shall be paused,
24
and the parties will attempt to resolve those issues. The suspended time will not
25
count against the time limitations in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. If the
26
technical difficulties cannot be resolved to the satisfaction of the court reporter, the
27
deposition shall be suspended. The same rule applies to any technical difficulty that
28
prevents the deponent or any lead counsel from hearing or seeing the deposition. If
3
STIPULATED REMOTE VIDEO DEPOSITION PROTOCOL
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No.: 3:20-cv-00170-WHA
1
the concerns cannot be resolved, then the deposition shall be suspended until the
2
concerns are resolved by the Court or through other means. The court reporter shall
3
at all times be visible on video so as to best ensure that the reporter is connected to
4
the deposition.
5
12. The remote deposition vendor may make available a secure breakout room that may
6
not be accessed by opposing counsel. Conversations in the breakout room shall not
7
be recorded by any means. Each party may also make their own breakout
8
arrangements (e.g., a separate conference line). During these private conferences or
9
other breaks, the main videoconference feed will remain “live.”
10
13. There will be no communication by any counsel with the deponent during actual
11
questioning by text, chat, or otherwise, except those communications on the record,
12
and any text/chat function in the videoconference technology used to host the
13
deposition shall, if possible, be disabled. Counsel for the deponent and other parties
14
participating in the deposition are forbidden from sending private messages to or
15
using any private “chat” features with the deponent during questioning sessions.
16
14. Lead counsel may display documents to the deponent during the deposition via
17
electronic means. However, before questioning a witness about the document,
18
counsel must first identify that document for the record, assign it a unique exhibit
19
number, and provide a copy of the document to all other lead counsel and the witness
20
electronically via secure FTP site, ShareFile, or other secure means. For any Excel
21
document produced to opposing counsel in native format that counsel plans to use
22
during the deposition, counsel will introduce the produced slip sheet noting that the
23
document was produced in native format, together with the native file, as one exhibit.
24
15. If, during the course of questioning, a deponent wishes to review a document that is
25
being displayed, the questioning counsel shall display or make available all portions
26
of the document requested by the deponent (or give the witness the ability to scroll
27
through the document electronically if no hard copies were provided to the
28
deponent).
4
STIPULATED REMOTE VIDEO DEPOSITION PROTOCOL
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No.: 3:20-cv-00170-WHA
1
16. If, during the course of questioning, a deponent wishes to review a document that is
2
not being displayed or referenced on the record, because, for example, the deponent
3
wishes to review a document to refresh his or her recollection, the deponent must
4
first state their intent to do so, and fully identify the document that the deponent
5
wishes to review, prior to beginning their review. The document must be uploaded
6
via secure FTP site, ShareFile, or other secure electronic means and available to all
7
lead counsel.
8
C.
At the Conclusion of the Deposition
1.
9
It is the obligation of any questioning counsel who uses a document with the
10
deponent to provide a copy of the document in the form used with the deponent to the
11
court reporter within one business day (if provided electronically) or three business
12
days (if provided in hard copy) of the deposition’s conclusion, if a copy of that
13
document was not provided to the parties and the court reporter in advance of the
14
deposition. The questioning counsel shall simultaneously provide these documents
15
to all counsel electronically via secure FTP site, ShareFile, or other secure means.
2.
16
If a deponent requests the opportunity to review a hard copy of their deposition
17
transcript for transcription errors, the period of time allowed for such review will not
18
commence until after receipt of the hard copy by the deponent.
3.
19
sheet notarized in order to be deemed effective.
20
21
22
The parties stipulate that no deponent shall be required to have execution of the errata
D.
Application of Protocol
1.
The parties agree that, in light of the COVID-19 pandemic, this protocol shall by
23
default apply to depositions taken in this action. The parties agree to meet and confer
24
in the future regarding the safety and propriety of holding any particular deposition
25
in-person, taking into account all relevant factors including containment of the
26
COVID-19 pandemic and the individual circumstances of the parties, their counsel,
27
and the deponent.
28
5
STIPULATED REMOTE VIDEO DEPOSITION PROTOCOL
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No.: 3:20-cv-00170-WHA
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
DATED: February 18, 2021
By: /s/ Thomas C. Bright
Thomas C. Bright
Respectfully submitted,
By:
/s/ Ashley M. Simonsen
Ashley Simonsen
SOLOMON B. CERA (Bar No. 99467)
THOMAS C. BRIGHT (Bar No.
169713)
CERA LLP
595 Market Street, Suite 1350
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: +1 (415) 777-2230
Facsimile: +1 (415) 777-5189
Email: scera@cerallp.com
Email: tbright@cerallp.com
10
SIMON J. FRANKEL (Bar No. 171552)
SEAN F. HOWELL (Bar No. 315967)
COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
Salesforce Tower
415 Mission Street, Suite 5400
San Francisco, CA 94105-2533
Telephone: + 1 (415) 591-6000
Facsimile: + 1 (415) 591-6091
Email: sfrankel@cov.com
Email: showell@cov.com
-and-
11
ASHLEY M. SIMONSEN (Bar No.
275203)
COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
1999 Avenue of the Stars
Los Angeles, CA 90067-4643
Telephone: +1 (424) 332-4782
Facsimile: +1 (424) 332-4749
Email: asimonsen@cov.com
By: /s/ David A. Hodges
DAVID A. HODGES (Admitted Pro
Hac Vice)
THE DAVID HODGES LAW FIRM
212 Center Street, 5th Floor
Little Rock, AR 72201
Email: david@hodgeslaw.com
12
13
14
15
KATHRYN E. CAHOY (Bar No.
298777)
COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
3000 El Camino Real
5 Palo Alto Square, 10th Floor
Palo Alto, CA 94306-2112
Telephone: + 1 (650) 632-4700
Facsimile: + 1 (650) 632-4800
Email: kcahoy@cov.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
and the Proposed Class.
16
17
18
19
Attorneys for Defendant Facebook, Inc.
20
ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 5-1(i)(3)
21
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has
22
been obtained from each of the signatories hereto.
23
By:
24
25
/s/ Ashley M. Simonsen
ASHLEY M. SIMONSEN
Attorney for Defendant Facebook, Inc.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
27
Dated: February 22, 2021
By:
28
6
STIPULATED REMOTE VIDEO DEPOSITION PROTOCOL
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Hon. William Alsup
United States District Judge
Case No.: 3:20-cv-00170-WHA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?