Klein et al v. Parker University
Filing
29
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 28 to Continue Initial Case Managment Conference AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT. Case Management Statement due by 2/11/2021. Initial Case Management Conference previously set for 12/10/2020 is continued to 2/18/2021 at 10:0 0 AM. All parties shall appear telephonically and must contact Court Conference at (866) 582-6878 at least one week prior to the Conference to arrange their participation. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 11/19/2020. (clS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/19/2020)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
BRIAN D. BERRY, CA Bar No. 229893
brian.berry@ogletree.com
ANDREW M. MASSARA, CA Bar No. 282913
andrew.massara@ogletree.com
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK &
STEWART, P.C.
Steuart Tower, Suite 1300
One Market Plaza
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone:
415-442-4810
Facsimile:
415-442-4870
THOMAS A. LIDBURY, IL Bar No. 6211158*
thomas.lidbury@ogletree.com
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK &
STEWART, P.C.
155 North Wacker Drive, Suite 4300
Chicago, IL 60606
Telephone:
312-916-2168
Facsimile:
312-807-3619
*Admitted Pro Hac Vice
Attorneys for Defendant
PARKER UNIVERSITY
Attorney names continued on next page
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
DR. LAURIE KLEIN, DR. CRAIG MAURER,
DR. STEVE LIRINGIS AND LISA
LIRINGIS, DR. TODD ANTOVICH AND
CAROL ANTOVICH, DR. RANDY MANTZ
AND CARLENE MANTZ, DR. PAMELA
HART, DR. GREG MOLIS, DR. LES
COHEN, DR. KEN CARLE, DR. SHANE
STAKER AND KELLY STAKER, DR.
KEITH ALEXANDER, BETSY STUMMER,
DR. JOHN SUTO AND DR. BILLIE SUTO,
DR. JEFFREY FAILING, DR. MICHAEL
GAGNON, DR. CRAIG LADOW, MIMI H.
DUONG, DR. CRAIG THORNALLY, DR.
MARK de DUBOVAY AND BARBARA de
DUBOVAY, DR. RONALD B. SANDERS,
DR. PEGGY ANDERSON, AND DR. PAM
WACHHOLZ AND BOB NESTE,
25
26
Case No. 3:20-cv-03194-RS
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE
INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE; ORDER
AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT
Complaint Filed: May 9, 2020
Trial Date:
None Set
Judge:
Hon. Richard Seeborg
Plaintiffs,
v.
27
PARKER UNIVERSITY,
28
Defendant.
Case No. 3:20-cv-03194-RS
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER
1
6
SBAITI & COMPANY PLLC
Mazin A. Sbaiti, CA Bar No. 275089
mas@sbaitilaw.com
Jonathan E. Bridges (Pro Hac Vice Motion Forthcoming)
Texas Bar No. 1028835
Brad J. Robinson (Pro Hac Vice Motion Forthcoming)
Texas Bar No. 24058076
2200 Ross Avenue, Suite 4900W
Dallas, TX 75201
Telephone: (214) 432-2899
Facsimile: (214) 853-4367
7
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
2
3
4
5
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 3:20-cv-03194-RS
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER
1
2
3
Plaintiffs Dr. Laura Klein, et al. (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant Parker University (“Parker”)
hereby jointly stipulate as follows:
On September 23, 2020, this Court continued the Initial Case Management Conference
4
(“CMC”) from October 8, 2020 to December 10, 2020. Dkt. 22. On October 12, 2020, the Parties
5
stipulated to continue Parker’s Deadline to respond to Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint from
6
October 15, 2020 to October 29, 2020. Dkt. 23. On October 29, 2020, Parker filed a Motion to
7
Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (Dkt. 24) and a Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim
8
(Dkt. 25), both of which were set for hearing on December 3, 2020, prior to the CMC. On
9
November 6, 2020 and pursuant to the stipulation of the Parties, this Court continued the hearing
10
11
on Parker’s Motions to Dismiss until January 28, 2021. Dkt. 27.
To conserve the Court’s and the Parties’ resources, the Parties stipulate to and respectfully
12
request that the Court vacate the CMC currently scheduled for December 10, 2020 and reset the
13
CMC to take place on February 18, 2021. Joint Case Management Statement Due February 11, 2021.
All parties shall appear telephonically and must contact Court Conference at (866) 582-6878 at least
one week prior to the Conference to arrange their participation.
14
15
16
17
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
DATED: November 19, 2020
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK &
STEWART, P.C.
18
19
20
21
22
By: /s/ Andrew M. Massara
BRIAN D. BERRY
THOMAS A. LIDBURY
ANDREW M. MASSARA
Attorneys for Defendant
PARKER UNIVERSITY
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
Case No. 3:20-cv-03194-RS
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER
1
DATED: November 19, 2020
SBAITI & COMPANY PLLC
2
3
4
By: /s/ Brad J. Robinson
MAZIN A. SBAITI
JONATHAN E. BRIDGES
BRAD J. ROBINSON
5
6
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
DR. LAURIE KLEIN, DR. CRAIG MAURER,
DR. STEVE LIRINGIS AND LISA LIRINGIS,
DR. TODD ANTOVICH AND CAROL
ANTOVICH, DR. RANDY MANTZ AND
CARLENE MANTZ, DR. PAMELA HART,
DR. GREG MOLIS, DR. LES COHEN, DR.
KEN CARLE, DR. SHANE STAKER AND
KELLY STAKER, DR. KEITH ALEXANDER,
BETSY STUMMER, DR. JOHN SUTO AND
DR. BILLIE SUTO, DR. JEFFREY FAILING,
DR. MICHAEL GAGNON, DR. CRAIG
LADOW, MIMI H. DUONG, DR. CRAIG
THORNALLY, DR. MARK de DUBOVAY
AND BARBARA de DUBOVAY, DR.
RONALD B. SANDERS, DR. PEGGY
ANDERSON, AND DR. PAM WACHHOLZ
AND BOB NESTE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
SIGNATURE ATTESTATION
18
19
20
21
22
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document
has been obtained from the other signatories.
DATED: November 19, 2020
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK &
STEWART, P.C.
23
24
25
26
27
By: /s/ Andrew M. Massara
BRIAN D. BERRY
THOMAS A. LIDBURY
ANDREW M. MASSARA
Attorneys for Defendant
PARKER UNIVERSITY
28
2
Case No. 3:20-cv-03194-RS
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER
1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
3
4 Dated: November 19, 2020
5
6
Honorable Richard Seeborg
Judge of the United States District Court,
Northern District of California
7
8
9
45032752.1
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Case No. 3:20-cv-03194-RS
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?